The twin tragedies of 9/11

As this week’s commemorations of the attacks that took place on Sept. 11, 2001 continue, it is appropriate that the country pause to remember those who were lost and injured in the attacks and our response to them as well as those who distinguished themselves seeking to protect America and the values we hold dear. ...

Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Spencer Platt/Getty Images

As this week's commemorations of the attacks that took place on Sept. 11, 2001 continue, it is appropriate that the country pause to remember those who were lost and injured in the attacks and our response to them as well as those who distinguished themselves seeking to protect America and the values we hold dear.

As this week’s commemorations of the attacks that took place on Sept. 11, 2001 continue, it is appropriate that the country pause to remember those who were lost and injured in the attacks and our response to them as well as those who distinguished themselves seeking to protect America and the values we hold dear.

The wounds of that day and the scars they have left on our society are such that they are certain to be felt by most of us who were alive that day for the rest of our lives.

That said, it does not diminish — indeed, it enhances — those moments of remembrance if we take the time to acknowledge and consider those who have been the innocent victims of America’s grotesque, unjustifiable overreaction to those attacks. 

The numbers vary, but it is certain that well over 100,000 and perhaps as many as a million innocent Iraqis, Afghans, and Pakistanis have been killed as a result of America’s efforts to seek revenge for our losses. That means, even the lowest estimates of collateral damage associated with our invasion of Iraq alone from groups like the Associated Press, the Iraq Family Health Survey, or the Iraq Body Count Project, suggest that between 30 and 50 times as many Iraqis died as a result of our invasion as died in 9/11 attacks — which, of course, had no relationship whatsoever to the country in which they lived. Higher estimates, like those of the Lancet or the Opinion Research Business Survey, suggest totals 200 to 300 times higher. In Afghanistan too, civilians paid for our military intervention with their lives in multiples of our 9/11 losses.

These losses too involved mothers, fathers, and their children, bereavement and holes in the fabric of civilization that can never be mended. To ignore them is to recommit the crimes that led to both their deaths and those of the thousands who were lost in the World Trade Center, the Pentagon or in that field in Pennsylvania; it amounts once again to the valuing of the lives of those we know, those close to us, at a premium to those who are physically or culturally distant from us.

What happened that clear blue morning in early September a decade ago here in the United States was a ghastly example of the cost not just of misdirected fury but also of the disregard of the value of life, law and morality. So too were the losses that have come since.

To suggest that the tragedies of 9/11 took place exclusively on that day or that the victims worth mourning were exclusively Americans or our friends and allies is to misunderstand the nature not just of those tragedies but of tragedy in general. If we wish to mark those losses closest to us in a way that will reduce the likelihood of future such catastrophes or better, that will increase the likelihood of human progress away from such needless bloodletting, then we ought to spend time reflecting on the fate of those foreign, faceless others who died in the conflagrations that were ignited that day as well as on our own individual roles, however small, in promoting, rationalizing or ignoring America’s own crimes.

For the past ten years, our most visible commemoration of 9/11 has been the ways we sought vengeance, visiting death upon innocents purely based upon the pretext that our own suffering had been great. While we are pulling away and even repudiating the policies that were linked to our own misdeeds we should try to remember that calling one thing a policy and another a terrorist plot is an insufficient distinction to the dead.

A great tragedy took place on 9/11. It was compounded many times over in the decade since. Acknowledge both facts or invite the accusation that we have learned little or that we are no better than the enemies we condemn. 

David Rothkopf is visiting professor at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs and visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. His latest book is The Great Questions of Tomorrow. He has been a longtime contributor to Foreign Policy and was CEO and editor of the FP Group from 2012 to May 2017. Twitter: @djrothkopf

More from Foreign Policy

Residents evacuated from Shebekino and other Russian towns near the border with Ukraine are seen in a temporary shelter in Belgorod, Russia, on June 2.
Residents evacuated from Shebekino and other Russian towns near the border with Ukraine are seen in a temporary shelter in Belgorod, Russia, on June 2.

Russians Are Unraveling Before Our Eyes

A wave of fresh humiliations has the Kremlin struggling to control the narrative.

Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva shake hands in Beijing.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva shake hands in Beijing.

A BRICS Currency Could Shake the Dollar’s Dominance

De-dollarization’s moment might finally be here.

Keri Russell as Kate Wyler in an episode of The Diplomat
Keri Russell as Kate Wyler in an episode of The Diplomat

Is Netflix’s ‘The Diplomat’ Factual or Farcical?

A former U.S. ambassador, an Iran expert, a Libya expert, and a former U.K. Conservative Party advisor weigh in.

An illustration shows the faces of Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin interrupted by wavy lines of a fragmented map of Europe and Asia.
An illustration shows the faces of Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin interrupted by wavy lines of a fragmented map of Europe and Asia.

The Battle for Eurasia

China, Russia, and their autocratic friends are leading another epic clash over the world’s largest landmass.