Indian national security adviser: world close to “primeval anarchy”
Over at Global Dashboard, Richard Gowan highlights a very interesting speech by India’s national security advisor, Shiv Shankar Menon. It’s a generally gloomy rumination on the state of international law and global governance heavily influenced by classical realist thought. Some key passages: "[W]hile domestic societies have evolved or are evolving towards rule of law, international ...
Over at Global Dashboard, Richard Gowan highlights a very interesting speech by India's national security advisor, Shiv Shankar Menon. It's a generally gloomy rumination on the state of international law and global governance heavily influenced by classical realist thought. Some key passages:
Over at Global Dashboard, Richard Gowan highlights a very interesting speech by India’s national security advisor, Shiv Shankar Menon. It’s a generally gloomy rumination on the state of international law and global governance heavily influenced by classical realist thought. Some key passages:
"[W]hile domestic societies have evolved or are evolving towards rule of law, international society is still much closer to primeval anarchy…
…[W]e seem to be entering a phase of increasing militarization of international relations. Look at recent developments in the Middle East, where conventional air power, covert and Special Forces, and internet social media have been used in new tactical combinations with old fashioned propaganda and international institutions to change regimes and create political outcomes…
…We live in a time where international law remains underdeveloped, international governance is non-existent or weak, and international society is fundamentally anarchic. As a result the role of force in international relations has been magnified. But the age of weapons of mass destruction and newer technologies make it essential that we consider new ways of regulating the use of force in international relations.
Much has been made of the Chinese affinity for realist thought. If this speech is any indication, it has significant appeal in Delhi as well. It’s notable that the major powers who use coercive force most often beyond their borders–the Western powers–appear much less inclined to publicly embrace realism than the major powers who do not.
David Bosco is a professor at Indiana University’s Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies. He is the author of The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World’s Oceans. Twitter: @multilateralist
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.