Gen. Gorman’s papers: Interesting, and a model for how to present documents
The papers of retired Gen. Paul Gorman have been placed online. Recently I spent close to half a day looking through them. Gorman is an interesting figure, in the middle of things in Korea, in Vietnam and in the post-Vietnam rebuilding of the Army. I’d never before seen his speech proposing a kind of National ...
The papers of retired Gen. Paul Gorman have been placed online. Recently I spent close to half a day looking through them. Gorman is an interesting figure, in the middle of things in Korea, in Vietnam and in the post-Vietnam rebuilding of the Army. I'd never before seen his speech proposing a kind of National Training Center.
The papers of retired Gen. Paul Gorman have been placed online. Recently I spent close to half a day looking through them. Gorman is an interesting figure, in the middle of things in Korea, in Vietnam and in the post-Vietnam rebuilding of the Army. I’d never before seen his speech proposing a kind of National Training Center.
I found the papers intrinsically interesting, and his oral history, covering his time in the Korean and Vietnam Wars, as well as his role in the post-Vietnam rebuilding of the Army, is one of the best I’ve read. I’d recommend it especially to anyone interesting in learning about how to train soldiers.
But I also think this sort of presentation is a model for presenting the papers of significant figures. It was like a visit to the Army’s Military History Institute — without having to drive to Carlisle, Pennsylvania, and eat lunch down the road at Sheetz’s gas station.
Thomas E. Ricks is a former contributing editor to Foreign Policy. Twitter: @tomricks1
More from Foreign Policy

Chinese Hospitals Are Housing Another Deadly Outbreak
Authorities are covering up the spread of antibiotic-resistant pneumonia.

Henry Kissinger, Colossus on the World Stage
The late statesman was a master of realpolitik—whom some regarded as a war criminal.

The West’s False Choice in Ukraine
The crossroads is not between war and compromise, but between victory and defeat.

The Masterminds
Washington wants to get tough on China, and the leaders of the House China Committee are in the driver’s seat.