Rumelt on strategy (IV): First, you must learn to define the problem accurately
I think Rumelt’s book on strategy may be better at teaching people how to critique a strategy than how to devise one. But that is still a significant act. Rumelt emphasizes the need to soberly confront problems. "A good strategy defines a critical challenge. What is more, it builds a bridge between that challenge and ...
I think Rumelt's book on strategy may be better at teaching people how to critique a strategy than how to devise one. But that is still a significant act.
Rumelt emphasizes the need to soberly confront problems. "A good strategy defines a critical challenge. What is more, it builds a bridge between that challenge and action."
Also, he warns, "When a leader defines the 'problem' as underperformance, it sets the stage for bad strategy. Underperformance is a result. The true challenges are the reasons for the underperformance."
I think Rumelt’s book on strategy may be better at teaching people how to critique a strategy than how to devise one. But that is still a significant act.
Rumelt emphasizes the need to soberly confront problems. "A good strategy defines a critical challenge. What is more, it builds a bridge between that challenge and action."
Also, he warns, "When a leader defines the ‘problem’ as underperformance, it sets the stage for bad strategy. Underperformance is a result. The true challenges are the reasons for the underperformance."
The conclusion of his best chapter, "Bad Strategy," reminded me of the many hours I have spent reading official government documents and war plans: "Bad strategy is vacuous and superficial, has internal contradictions, and doesn’t define or address the problem. Bad strategy generates a feeling of dull annoyance when you have to listen to it or read it." That last sentence brought home to me many hours of reading Pentagon documents and transcripts.
More from Foreign Policy

Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.

So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.

Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.

Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.