What would realistic ethical training be like? And why don’t we have it?
There’s a terrific, thoughtful piece on the need for realistic ethical training in the November issue of Army magazine. It is by Kevin Bell, who was an Army captain and left to do graduate work in Middle Eastern studies at Princeton. Why, Bell wonders, do we have tough and realistic combat training, but not equally ...
There's a terrific, thoughtful piece on the need for realistic ethical training in the November issue of Army magazine. It is by Kevin Bell, who was an Army captain and left to do graduate work in Middle Eastern studies at Princeton.
There’s a terrific, thoughtful piece on the need for realistic ethical training in the November issue of Army magazine. It is by Kevin Bell, who was an Army captain and left to do graduate work in Middle Eastern studies at Princeton.
Why, Bell wonders, do we have tough and realistic combat training, but not equally realistic ethical training? Here is what I think the nut of the piece is:
As a profession we have to adjust our training so that we know what to do when rage tells us that it’s OK to go beyond the limits of tactical questioning with a captive. We can’t stop there, though. We need to talk to our peers and subordinates about the real challenges of ethical leadership in a way that acknowledges how our job culture can warp our understanding of morality.
There is a lot more to quote in the article. First, he says, let’s stop pretending that there is a huge distance between someone who tortures and someone who is a good officer. Also, don’t make people think through the ethical distinctions for the first time when they are seized with rage and grief over the death of a comrade. But, he continues, "lack of realism in detainee training is only the most obvious problem."
Don’t just preach to small unit leaders, he says. Give them concrete support that enables them to operationalize ethical standards. "It isn’t enough to know the rules if we are still unsure in a time of weakness what to do with detainees who might have tactically useful information."
Bell’s only misstep, I think, is his last sentence, about how if these changes are made, "The next generation of junior leaders will thank us." This rings false to me. Actually, if he is right — and I believe he is — I doubt they will thank anybody, they will just assume this is the right way to do things. (As a writer, I think people often go on a little too far in their conclusions.)
But that’s a minor gripe. It is an article worth reading, and Army magazine is to be commended for running it. I hereby award it The Best Defense prize for best defense commentary of the month.
More from Foreign Policy
At Long Last, the Foreign Service Gets the Netflix Treatment
Keri Russell gets Drexel furniture but no Senate confirmation hearing.
How Macron Is Blocking EU Strategy on Russia and China
As a strategic consensus emerges in Europe, France is in the way.
What the Bush-Obama China Memos Reveal
Newly declassified documents contain important lessons for U.S. China policy.
Russia’s Boom Business Goes Bust
Moscow’s arms exports have fallen to levels not seen since the Soviet Union’s collapse.
Sign up for World Brief
FP’s flagship evening newsletter guiding you through the most important world stories of the day. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
