‘Gingin au Congo’
Last week, I blogged some excerpts from Newt Gingrich’s 1971 doctoral thesis on Belgian Colonial education policy in the Congo. I was delighted to see that Mother Jones‘s Dave Gilson was inspired to create a mash-up of Gingrich’s text and images from Herge’s horrifically offensive 1931 comic, Tintin in the Congo. (Sample frame to the ...
Last week, I blogged some excerpts from Newt Gingrich's 1971 doctoral thesis on Belgian Colonial education policy in the Congo. I was delighted to see that Mother Jones's Dave Gilson was inspired to create a mash-up of Gingrich's text and images from Herge's horrifically offensive 1931 comic, Tintin in the Congo. (Sample frame to the left. I'm guessing that early Tintin title's not going to be getting the Spielberg treatment any time soon.)
On another note, several people on Twitter have questioned whether it's even fair to examine Gingrich's 40-year-old writings. I agree it would be wrong to assume that Gingrich still agrees with the opinions in the paper. (For one thing, I'm guessing he no longer thinks global inequality is a greater national security threat than nuclear weapons.) But I also think that Gingrich's frequent references to his own academic credentials, as well as his assertions that an understanding of Saul Alinsky and "Kenyan anti-colonialism" are necessary to understanding President Obama's worldview, make his own early scholarly works fair game.
Last week, I blogged some excerpts from Newt Gingrich’s 1971 doctoral thesis on Belgian Colonial education policy in the Congo. I was delighted to see that Mother Jones‘s Dave Gilson was inspired to create a mash-up of Gingrich’s text and images from Herge’s horrifically offensive 1931 comic, Tintin in the Congo. (Sample frame to the left. I’m guessing that early Tintin title’s not going to be getting the Spielberg treatment any time soon.)
On another note, several people on Twitter have questioned whether it’s even fair to examine Gingrich’s 40-year-old writings. I agree it would be wrong to assume that Gingrich still agrees with the opinions in the paper. (For one thing, I’m guessing he no longer thinks global inequality is a greater national security threat than nuclear weapons.) But I also think that Gingrich’s frequent references to his own academic credentials, as well as his assertions that an understanding of Saul Alinsky and “Kenyan anti-colonialism” are necessary to understanding President Obama’s worldview, make his own early scholarly works fair game.
Joshua Keating was an associate editor at Foreign Policy. Twitter: @joshuakeating
More from Foreign Policy


Lessons for the Next War
Twelve experts weigh in on how to prevent, deter, and—if necessary—fight the next conflict.


It’s High Time to Prepare for Russia’s Collapse
Not planning for the possibility of disintegration betrays a dangerous lack of imagination.


Turkey Is Sending Cold War-Era Cluster Bombs to Ukraine
The artillery-fired cluster munitions could be lethal to Russian troops—and Ukrainian civilians.


Congrats, You’re a Member of Congress. Now Listen Up.
Some brief foreign-policy advice for the newest members of the U.S. legislature.