Gen. Dunford responds: I AM getting real
Here is a note from General Joseph Dunford, the assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, responding to my post Friday saying I was worried by how the Marine Corps is handling the budget implosion. — “Tom: I believe your recommendation that we simply announce that we are cutting the Corps to 150K misses the mark. ...
Here is a note from General Joseph Dunford, the assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, responding to my post Friday saying I was worried by how the Marine Corps is handling the budget implosion.
--
"Tom: I believe your recommendation that we simply announce that we are cutting the Corps to 150K misses the mark. Frankly, it doesn't make any sense. What analysis supports 150K? As I very carefully explained in my presentation, the responsibility of Marine Corps leadership is to recommend an organizational construct for the Corps that supports our National Security Strategy in the context of the future security environment. After rigorous analysis, that's exactly what we have done. I can assure you that we're fully prepared to refine our recommendations as refinements are made to our strategy/budget. While you are "bothered" by the way we have attacked the issue, we have attacked it the only way we know how. We have done due diligence and told the truth. Another point you may have missed in both my presentation at CSIS and our off the record session at CNAS concerns readiness. I made it very clear that regardless of our future force structure, the Commandant will deliver a capable and ready Corps of Marines to our Nation. That's what we do -- and our track record speaks for itself.
Here is a note from General Joseph Dunford, the assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, responding to my post Friday saying I was worried by how the Marine Corps is handling the budget implosion.
“Tom: I believe your recommendation that we simply announce that we are cutting the Corps to 150K misses the mark. Frankly, it doesn’t make any sense. What analysis supports 150K? As I very carefully explained in my presentation, the responsibility of Marine Corps leadership is to recommend an organizational construct for the Corps that supports our National Security Strategy in the context of the future security environment. After rigorous analysis, that’s exactly what we have done. I can assure you that we’re fully prepared to refine our recommendations as refinements are made to our strategy/budget. While you are “bothered” by the way we have attacked the issue, we have attacked it the only way we know how. We have done due diligence and told the truth. Another point you may have missed in both my presentation at CSIS and our off the record session at CNAS concerns readiness. I made it very clear that regardless of our future force structure, the Commandant will deliver a capable and ready Corps of Marines to our Nation. That’s what we do — and our track record speaks for itself.
Semper Fidelis
Tom again: I dunno. Maybe I wasn’t clear enough. Not only do I think it unrealistic for the Marine Corps to plan on shrinking to just 186,000, I think the larger question is whether the Marine Corps should focus the discussion on the size of the force or the quality of the force. When asked how big they will be, I think they probably should say, As big as we can be while being a force in readiness.
More from Foreign Policy


Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.


So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.


Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.


Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.