Back when bishops talked about warfare
I was reading an article on military affairs that appeared in 1984 in the International Journal of Applied Philosophy and was struck by a reference to the Bishops’ Pastoral Letter on nuclear warfare that was issued by American Catholic leaders a year earlier. It made me think-back then, the bishops were all over the issue ...
I was reading an article on military affairs that appeared in 1984 in the International Journal of Applied Philosophy and was struck by a reference to the Bishops' Pastoral Letter on nuclear warfare that was issued by American Catholic leaders a year earlier.
I was reading an article on military affairs that appeared in 1984 in the International Journal of Applied Philosophy and was struck by a reference to the Bishops’ Pastoral Letter on nuclear warfare that was issued by American Catholic leaders a year earlier.
It made me think-back then, the bishops were all over the issue of warfare. They condemned offensive war. (Point 1.A.3: "Offensive war of any kind is not morally justifiable.") Yet for the last 10 years, we have been at war, and I can’t remember the bishops weighing in particularly, not even when the world’s most powerful country launched a preemptive war on false premises. What up with that? Did they just get bored? Was it just a passing phase?
Thomas E. Ricks is a former contributing editor to Foreign Policy. Twitter: @tomricks1
More from Foreign Policy

America Is a Heartbeat Away From a War It Could Lose
Global war is neither a theoretical contingency nor the fever dream of hawks and militarists.

The West’s Incoherent Critique of Israel’s Gaza Strategy
The reality of fighting Hamas in Gaza makes this war terrible one way or another.

Biden Owns the Israel-Palestine Conflict Now
In tying Washington to Israel’s war in Gaza, the U.S. president now shares responsibility for the broader conflict’s fate.

Taiwan’s Room to Maneuver Shrinks as Biden and Xi Meet
As the latest crisis in the straits wraps up, Taipei is on the back foot.