Daniel W. Drezner

Gmail provides the new, hip trend in wonkery

Opening up my Gmail account yesterday, I saw the following announcement across the top encased in a pink banner:  We believe state-sponsored attackers may be attempting to compromise your account or computer. Protect yourself now. As FP’s Josh Rogin and others have reported, this is part of Google’s new policy of warning users specifically of ...

Opening up my Gmail account yesterday, I saw the following announcement across the top encased in a pink banner: 

We believe state-sponsored attackers may be attempting to compromise your account or computer. Protect yourself now.

As FP's Josh Rogin and others have reported, this is part of Google's new policy of warning users specifically of "state-sponsored attackers."  It should be noted that Google's advice is essentially the same as it has always been -- follow good email hygeine and be careful about opening up attachments. 

Opening up my Gmail account yesterday, I saw the following announcement across the top encased in a pink banner: 

We believe state-sponsored attackers may be attempting to compromise your account or computer. Protect yourself now.

As FP’s Josh Rogin and others have reported, this is part of Google’s new policy of warning users specifically of "state-sponsored attackers."  It should be noted that Google’s advice is essentially the same as it has always been — follow good email hygeine and be careful about opening up attachments. 

So, this warning doesn’t really change things on my end all that much.  I do wonder, however, if this will be yet another signifier that wonks inside and outside the Beltway will use to measure their "influence".  I can all to easily imagine the following exchange taking place this morning at a DC Caribou Coffee:

WONK 1:  So did you get the Gmail warning?  Isn’t that pink header a little creepy?

WONK 2:  What pink header?  What are you talking about? 

WONK 1:  You know, the Gmail  notification  saying that you account might be the object of a state-sponsored attack.

WONK 2:  No, I didn’t get that.

WONK 1:  Oh.

[Long, awkward pause]

WONK 1:  I’m sure it’s just an oversight by the Chinese/Iranian/Russian/American authorities!

WONK 2:  I can’t believe this.  My Klout score is higher than yours! 

WONK 1:  This just shows how inept the security apparatus is in Beijing/Tehran/Moscow/Washington.

WONK 2:  Just you wait.  After my Washington Post op-ed runs tomorrow, I’ll be getting that pink banner! 

WONK 1 [pats WONK 2 on the back]:  Atta boy. 

Of course, us academics would never have this kind of conversation.  Now, if you’ll excuse me, I need to polish my cv. 

Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at Tufts University’s Fletcher School. He blogged regularly for Foreign Policy from 2009 to 2014. Twitter: @dandrezner

More from Foreign Policy

Volker Perthes, U.N. special representative for Sudan, addresses the media in Khartoum, Sudan, on Jan. 10.

Sudan’s Future Hangs in the Balance

Demonstrators find themselves at odds with key U.N. and U.S. mediators.

In an aerial view, traffic creeps along Virginia Highway 1 after being diverted away from Interstate 95 after it was closed due to a winter storm.

Traffic Jams Are a Very American Disaster

The I-95 backup shows how easily highways can become traps.

Relatives and neighbors gather around a burned vehicle targeted and hit by an American drone strike in Kabul.

The Human Rights vs. National Security Dilemma Is a Fallacy

Advocacy organizations can’t protect human rights without challenging U.S. military support for tyrants and the corrupt influence of the defense industry and foreign governments.

un-sanctions-inspectors-china-foreign-policy-illustration

The Problem With Sanctions

From the White House to Turtle Bay, sanctions have never been more popular. But why are they so hard to make work?