IMF economist resigns, blasts institution
CNN has obtained the resignation letter proferred by senior International Monetary Fund economist Peter Doyle. It’s a broad indictment of the Fund but focuses in particular on the organization’s failure to adequately warn policymakers about the 2008 financial crisis and the ongoing Eurozone crisis. Doyle alleges that senior officials in the institution suppressed staff analyses ...
CNN has obtained the resignation letter proferred by senior International Monetary Fund economist Peter Doyle. It's a broad indictment of the Fund but focuses in particular on the organization's failure to adequately warn policymakers about the 2008 financial crisis and the ongoing Eurozone crisis. Doyle alleges that senior officials in the institution suppressed staff analyses predicting both crises. (Both failures of the IMF's "surveillance" system have been previously examined by the Fund, and Doyle appears to endorse many of the conclusions reached in those reports).
CNN has obtained the resignation letter proferred by senior International Monetary Fund economist Peter Doyle. It’s a broad indictment of the Fund but focuses in particular on the organization’s failure to adequately warn policymakers about the 2008 financial crisis and the ongoing Eurozone crisis. Doyle alleges that senior officials in the institution suppressed staff analyses predicting both crises. (Both failures of the IMF’s "surveillance" system have been previously examined by the Fund, and Doyle appears to endorse many of the conclusions reached in those reports).
His broadest critique, however, is that the Fund’s predictive failures are ultimately a consequence of the institution’s flawed leadership selection process. "Even the current incumbent is tainted, as neither her gender, integrity, or elan can’t make up for the fundamental illegitimacy of the selection process." Doyle appears to be arguing that a different process–presumably one that gave non-Europeans a real shot at the managing director’s slot–would produce a Fund less beholden to its largest shareholders and more capable of independent analysis. But he offers little evidence that this is the case, and it’s not obvious why it should be. With Doyle’s letter now public, let’s hope that he’ll flesh out his critique.
David Bosco is a professor at Indiana University’s Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies. He is the author of The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World’s Oceans. Twitter: @multilateralist
More from Foreign Policy
Russians Are Unraveling Before Our Eyes
A wave of fresh humiliations has the Kremlin struggling to control the narrative.
A BRICS Currency Could Shake the Dollar’s Dominance
De-dollarization’s moment might finally be here.
Is Netflix’s ‘The Diplomat’ Factual or Farcical?
A former U.S. ambassador, an Iran expert, a Libya expert, and a former U.K. Conservative Party advisor weigh in.
The Battle for Eurasia
China, Russia, and their autocratic friends are leading another epic clash over the world’s largest landmass.
Sign up for World Brief
FP’s flagship evening newsletter guiding you through the most important world stories of the day. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
