IMF economist resigns, blasts institution
CNN has obtained the resignation letter proferred by senior International Monetary Fund economist Peter Doyle. It’s a broad indictment of the Fund but focuses in particular on the organization’s failure to adequately warn policymakers about the 2008 financial crisis and the ongoing Eurozone crisis. Doyle alleges that senior officials in the institution suppressed staff analyses ...
CNN has obtained the resignation letter proferred by senior International Monetary Fund economist Peter Doyle. It's a broad indictment of the Fund but focuses in particular on the organization's failure to adequately warn policymakers about the 2008 financial crisis and the ongoing Eurozone crisis. Doyle alleges that senior officials in the institution suppressed staff analyses predicting both crises. (Both failures of the IMF's "surveillance" system have been previously examined by the Fund, and Doyle appears to endorse many of the conclusions reached in those reports).
His broadest critique, however, is that the Fund's predictive failures are ultimately a consequence of the institution's flawed leadership selection process. "Even the current incumbent is tainted, as neither her gender, integrity, or elan can't make up for the fundamental illegitimacy of the selection process." Doyle appears to be arguing that a different process--presumably one that gave non-Europeans a real shot at the managing director's slot--would produce a Fund less beholden to its largest shareholders and more capable of independent analysis. But he offers little evidence that this is the case, and it's not obvious why it should be. With Doyle's letter now public, let's hope that he'll flesh out his critique.
CNN has obtained the resignation letter proferred by senior International Monetary Fund economist Peter Doyle. It’s a broad indictment of the Fund but focuses in particular on the organization’s failure to adequately warn policymakers about the 2008 financial crisis and the ongoing Eurozone crisis. Doyle alleges that senior officials in the institution suppressed staff analyses predicting both crises. (Both failures of the IMF’s "surveillance" system have been previously examined by the Fund, and Doyle appears to endorse many of the conclusions reached in those reports).
His broadest critique, however, is that the Fund’s predictive failures are ultimately a consequence of the institution’s flawed leadership selection process. "Even the current incumbent is tainted, as neither her gender, integrity, or elan can’t make up for the fundamental illegitimacy of the selection process." Doyle appears to be arguing that a different process–presumably one that gave non-Europeans a real shot at the managing director’s slot–would produce a Fund less beholden to its largest shareholders and more capable of independent analysis. But he offers little evidence that this is the case, and it’s not obvious why it should be. With Doyle’s letter now public, let’s hope that he’ll flesh out his critique.
More from Foreign Policy
Why Do People Hate Realism So Much?
The school of thought doesn’t explain everything—but its proponents foresaw the potential for conflict over Ukraine long before it erupted.
China’s Crisis of Confidence
What if, instead of being a competitor, China can no longer afford to compete at all?
Why This Global Economic Crisis Is Different
This is the first time since World War II that there may be no cooperative way out.
China Is Hardening Itself for Economic War
Beijing is trying to close economic vulnerabilities out of fear of U.S. containment.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today from Foreign Policy’s newsletter writer Colm Quinn.
By signing up, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to occasionally receive special offers from Foreign Policy.