Passport

Highlights from Condi’s convention speech

Condoleezza Rice received a standing ovation when she took the stage at the Republican convention in Tampa on Wednesday night, and the crowd remained every bit as enthusiastic throughout the address — especially when Rice marveled at how an African-American girl from the segregated South could aspire to the presidency and become secretary of state.  ...

Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Condoleezza Rice received a standing ovation when she took the stage at the Republican convention in Tampa on Wednesday night, and the crowd remained every bit as enthusiastic throughout the address -- especially when Rice marveled at how an African-American girl from the segregated South could aspire to the presidency and become secretary of state. 

The speech by Rice -- and another earlier in the evening by Senator John McCain (R-AZ) -- marked the first extended discussion of foreign policy during the convention. Here are some of the takeaways from Condi's big speech:

Leading from behind: We've seen a lot of talk over the last couple days about American exceptionalism and a second American century, but tonight's programming introduced a fresh term into the anti-decline lexicon at the convention. The phrase "leading from behind" was first attributed to an anonymous Obama advisor in a 2011 New Yorker article, but it has since morphed into a GOP talking point, making its way into this year's Republican platform. In his speech (and FP column) McCain declared that America is "exceptional" because it has always "led from the front." Rice too declared that "you cannot lead from behind." Both speakers warned that if the United States refuses to lead assertively, a chaotic and dangerous world -- perhaps one with more sinister international actors at the helm -- awaits. 'Where does America stand?' In arguably her most cutting criticism of the Obama administration, Rice argued that the "question of the hour," as the Middle East convulses, is "where does American stand?" Since the end of World War II, she continued, the United States has "had an answer to that question: we stand for free peoples and free markets."  Freedom agenda: "Idealism in foreign policy," the New Republic's Leon Wieseltier wrote a few years ago, "is so 2003." By that he meant that Democrats, in response to the Iraq War and George W. Bush's "Freedom Agenda," had decided to sideline human rights and democracy promotion in their foreign policy. Tonight, both McCain and Rice (the latter more subtly) chastised the Obama administration for not championing freedom and democratic values. McCain, for example, criticized the president for not standing with Iranian protesters in 2009. Rice, for her part, observed that while it's not always easy to "speak for those who would otherwise not have a voice," the United States "will sustain a balance of power that favors freedom."  Trade: Rice warned that the United States was "abandoning the field of free and fair trade" at its peril. "The United States has ratified only three free-trade agreements in the last few years," she noted, "and those were negotiated in the Bush administration. China has signed 15 free-trade agreements and is in the progress of negotiating as many as 18 more." As my colleague Josh Rogin points out, China may actually have fewer free-trade deals than Rice suggests. But the former secretary of state isn't the only one making this point. Jon Huntsman, a former Republican presidential candidate and U.S. ambassador to China, remarked last October that when it came to striking free-trade deals, "China is in the game" and "[w]e are not."   Immigration: At a time when the Republican Party has been stressing its tough, enforcement-first stance on immigration, Rice suggested a middle ground. "We must continue to welcome the world's most ambitious people to be a part of us," she said. "In that way we stay young and optimistic and determined. We need immigration laws that protect our borders, meet our economic needs, and yet show that we are a compassionate nation of immigrants." Partisanship: As convention speeches go, Rice's wasn't particularly ideological. She never mentioned Barack Obama or Democrats, and she referenced Republicans only once -- when she greeted the crowd.  

Condoleezza Rice received a standing ovation when she took the stage at the Republican convention in Tampa on Wednesday night, and the crowd remained every bit as enthusiastic throughout the address — especially when Rice marveled at how an African-American girl from the segregated South could aspire to the presidency and become secretary of state. 

The speech by Rice — and another earlier in the evening by Senator John McCain (R-AZ) — marked the first extended discussion of foreign policy during the convention. Here are some of the takeaways from Condi’s big speech:

  • Leading from behind: We’ve seen a lot of talk over the last couple days about American exceptionalism and a second American century, but tonight’s programming introduced a fresh term into the anti-decline lexicon at the convention. The phrase "leading from behind" was first attributed to an anonymous Obama advisor in a 2011 New Yorker article, but it has since morphed into a GOP talking point, making its way into this year’s Republican platform. In his speech (and FP column) McCain declared that America is "exceptional" because it has always "led from the front." Rice too declared that "you cannot lead from behind." Both speakers warned that if the United States refuses to lead assertively, a chaotic and dangerous world — perhaps one with more sinister international actors at the helm — awaits.
  • ‘Where does America stand?’ In arguably her most cutting criticism of the Obama administration, Rice argued that the "question of the hour," as the Middle East convulses, is "where does American stand?" Since the end of World War II, she continued, the United States has "had an answer to that question: we stand for free peoples and free markets." 
  • Freedom agenda: "Idealism in foreign policy," the New Republic‘s Leon Wieseltier wrote a few years ago, "is so 2003." By that he meant that Democrats, in response to the Iraq War and George W. Bush’s "Freedom Agenda," had decided to sideline human rights and democracy promotion in their foreign policy. Tonight, both McCain and Rice (the latter more subtly) chastised the Obama administration for not championing freedom and democratic values. McCain, for example, criticized the president for not standing with Iranian protesters in 2009. Rice, for her part, observed that while it’s not always easy to "speak for those who would otherwise not have a voice," the United States "will sustain a balance of power that favors freedom." 
  • Trade: Rice warned that the United States was "abandoning the field of free and fair trade" at its peril. "The United States has ratified only three free-trade agreements in the last few years," she noted, "and those were negotiated in the Bush administration. China has signed 15 free-trade agreements and is in the progress of negotiating as many as 18 more." As my colleague Josh Rogin points out, China may actually have fewer free-trade deals than Rice suggests. But the former secretary of state isn’t the only one making this point. Jon Huntsman, a former Republican presidential candidate and U.S. ambassador to China, remarked last October that when it came to striking free-trade deals, "China is in the game" and "[w]e are not."  
  • Immigration: At a time when the Republican Party has been stressing its tough, enforcement-first stance on immigration, Rice suggested a middle ground. "We must continue to welcome the world’s most ambitious people to be a part of us," she said. "In that way we stay young and optimistic and determined. We need immigration laws that protect our borders, meet our economic needs, and yet show that we are a compassionate nation of immigrants."
  • Partisanship: As convention speeches go, Rice’s wasn’t particularly ideological. She never mentioned Barack Obama or Democrats, and she referenced Republicans only once — when she greeted the crowd.  

Uri Friedman is deputy managing editor at Foreign Policy. Before joining FP, he reported for the Christian Science Monitor, worked on corporate strategy for Atlantic Media, helped launch the Atlantic Wire, and covered international affairs for the site. A proud native of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, he studied European history at the University of Pennsylvania and has lived in Barcelona, Spain and Geneva, Switzerland. Twitter: @UriLF

More from Foreign Policy

An illustration of a captain's hat with a 1980s era Pepsi logo and USSR and U.S. flag pins.

The Doomed Voyage of Pepsi’s Soviet Navy

A three-decade dream of communist markets ended in the scrapyard.

Demonstrators with CASA in Action and Service Employees International Union 32BJ march against the Trump administration’s immigration policies in Washington on May 1, 2017.

Unionization Can End America’s Supply Chain Crisis

Allowing workers to organize would protect and empower undocumented immigrants critical to the U.S. economy.

The downtown district of Wilmington, Delaware, is seen on Aug. 19, 2016.

How Delaware Became the World’s Biggest Offshore Haven

Kleptocrats, criminals, and con artists have all parked their illicit gains in the state.