Passport

Geert Wilders’ American friends

Anthony Deutsch and Mark Hosenball suggest in a new article for Reuters that anti-Islam Dutch politician Geert Wilders’ activities are being financially supported — at least in part — by anti-Islam groups in the United States: The Middle East Forum, a pro-Israeli think tank based in Philadelphia, funded Wilders’ legal defense in 2010 and 2011 ...

ROBIN UTRECHT/AFP/GettyImages
ROBIN UTRECHT/AFP/GettyImages

Anthony Deutsch and Mark Hosenball suggest in a new article for Reuters that anti-Islam Dutch politician Geert Wilders’ activities are being financially supported — at least in part — by anti-Islam groups in the United States:

The Middle East Forum, a pro-Israeli think tank based in Philadelphia, funded Wilders’ legal defense in 2010 and 2011 against Dutch charges of inciting racial hatred, its director Daniel Pipes said. The Middle East Forum has a stated goal, according to its website, of protecting the "freedom of public speech of anti-Islamist authors, promoting American interests in the Middle East and protecting the constitutional order from Middle Eastern threats". It sent money directly to Wilders’ lawyer via its Legal Project, Pipes said.

FrontPage magazine editor David Horowitz acknowledged paying Wilders "a good fee" for making speeches in the United States and helping to raise money to help him fight a controversial travel ban in Britain. He also co-hosted an auction of the Danish Mohammed cartoons with Wilders in Los Angeles but does not remember what happened to the proceeds. 

Horowitz and Pipes deny funding the Freedom Party’s activities in Holland, which would be illegal under U.S. law. Unlike most Dutch parties, the Freedom Party does not accept government subsidies, which means it doesn’t have to disclose its funding sources to the same extent. Its critics have alleged that much of its funding comes from outside the country. 

There isn’t quite a smoking gun here. Paying Wilders speaking fees or helping raise money for his legal defense isn’t quite the same thing as funding his political activities. But the article does underline the growing affinity between anti-Islam groups in the U.S. and their counterparts on the European far right which became apparent during the "Ground Zero Mosque" controversy.

In 2009, I attended a speech Wilders gave in Washington hosted by Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy. During that same trip, he was invited by U.S. Senator John Kyl to show his controversial documentary Fitna on Capitol Hill. 

The Netherlands is holding closely-watched parliamentary elections on Wednesday, during which Wilders’ group, along with the far-left Socialist Party, are looking to take advantage of anti-EU sentiment. 

Anthony Deutsch and Mark Hosenball suggest in a new article for Reuters that anti-Islam Dutch politician Geert Wilders’ activities are being financially supported — at least in part — by anti-Islam groups in the United States:

The Middle East Forum, a pro-Israeli think tank based in Philadelphia, funded Wilders’ legal defense in 2010 and 2011 against Dutch charges of inciting racial hatred, its director Daniel Pipes said. The Middle East Forum has a stated goal, according to its website, of protecting the "freedom of public speech of anti-Islamist authors, promoting American interests in the Middle East and protecting the constitutional order from Middle Eastern threats". It sent money directly to Wilders’ lawyer via its Legal Project, Pipes said.

FrontPage magazine editor David Horowitz acknowledged paying Wilders "a good fee" for making speeches in the United States and helping to raise money to help him fight a controversial travel ban in Britain. He also co-hosted an auction of the Danish Mohammed cartoons with Wilders in Los Angeles but does not remember what happened to the proceeds. 

Horowitz and Pipes deny funding the Freedom Party’s activities in Holland, which would be illegal under U.S. law. Unlike most Dutch parties, the Freedom Party does not accept government subsidies, which means it doesn’t have to disclose its funding sources to the same extent. Its critics have alleged that much of its funding comes from outside the country. 

There isn’t quite a smoking gun here. Paying Wilders speaking fees or helping raise money for his legal defense isn’t quite the same thing as funding his political activities. But the article does underline the growing affinity between anti-Islam groups in the U.S. and their counterparts on the European far right which became apparent during the "Ground Zero Mosque" controversy.

In 2009, I attended a speech Wilders gave in Washington hosted by Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy. During that same trip, he was invited by U.S. Senator John Kyl to show his controversial documentary Fitna on Capitol Hill. 

The Netherlands is holding closely-watched parliamentary elections on Wednesday, during which Wilders’ group, along with the far-left Socialist Party, are looking to take advantage of anti-EU sentiment. 

Joshua Keating was an associate editor at Foreign Policy  Twitter: @joshuakeating

More from Foreign Policy

coronavirus-vaccine-predictions-2021-foreign-policy-global-thinkers-brian-stauffer-illustration

The World After the Coronavirus

We asked 12 leading thinkers to predict what happens in 2021 and beyond.

Protesters prepare to burn an effigy of Chinese President Xi Jinping during an anti-China protest in Siliguri, India, on June 17, 2020.

Why Attempts to Build a New Anti-China Alliance Will Fail

The big strategic game in Asia isn’t military but economic.

china-bhutan-settlement-village-security-outpost-border-dispute

China Is Building Entire Villages in Another Country’s Territory

Since 2015, a previously unnoticed network of roads, buildings, and military outposts has been constructed deep in a sacred valley in Bhutan.