Do too few states contribute to UN peacekeeping?
Alex Bellamy and Paul D. Williams just released a new report assessing which countries contribute to United Nations peacekeeping missions and why. Their analysis is built on a disquieting reality: that a handful of countries provide the bulk of UN peacekeepers. "The task of providing peacekeepers continues to be met in a highly unequal manner ...
Alex Bellamy and Paul D. Williams just released a new report assessing which countries contribute to United Nations peacekeeping missions and why. Their analysis is built on a disquieting reality: that a handful of countries provide the bulk of UN peacekeepers. "The task of providing peacekeepers continues to be met in a highly unequal manner with well over two-thirds of all UN uniformed personnel coming from just twenty or so countries," they write. Many countries contribute only token forces--small numbers of soldiers that don't form a cohesive unit. These contributions, the authors note, are "obviously inefficient from a military perspective."
Alex Bellamy and Paul D. Williams just released a new report assessing which countries contribute to United Nations peacekeeping missions and why. Their analysis is built on a disquieting reality: that a handful of countries provide the bulk of UN peacekeepers. "The task of providing peacekeepers continues to be met in a highly unequal manner with well over two-thirds of all UN uniformed personnel coming from just twenty or so countries," they write. Many countries contribute only token forces–small numbers of soldiers that don’t form a cohesive unit. These contributions, the authors note, are "obviously inefficient from a military perspective."
The UN recognizes that it needs to broaden the base of significant contributors but faces significant headwinds, including financial constraints and newly stringent training requirements. One of the most interesting sections of the report draws on work by Donald C.F. Daniel to identify several countries that are promising candidates for enhanced participation (Mexico and Chile figure prominently). The whole report is worth a close read.
David Bosco is a professor at Indiana University’s Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies. He is the author of The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World’s Oceans. Twitter: @multilateralist
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.