Why China's dispute with Japan is more dangerous than you think.
The wave of anti-Japanese protests that swept across dozens of cities in China this weekend, prompted by Tokyo's purchase of three disputed islands, has obscured a potentially more worrying development that risks drawing the two countries into a larger conflict: China's adoption of a legal framework empowering it to expel foreign vessels in disputed waters in the East China Sea.
The wave of anti-Japanese protests that swept across dozens of cities in China this weekend, prompted by Tokyo’s purchase of three disputed islands, has obscured a potentially more worrying development that risks drawing the two countries into a larger conflict: China’s adoption of a legal framework empowering it to expel foreign vessels in disputed waters in the East China Sea.
The most recent round of tension between the world’s second- and third-largest economies reached a new height last week when Japan announced that it was finalizing the purchase of three of five uninhabited East China Sea islands — which Japan calls the Senkakus and China calls the Diaoyus. While the move was intended to prevent the hard-line, nationalist Tokyo governor from purchasing them himself, that distinction was apparently lost on Beijing, and Tokyo’s timing couldn’t have been worse.
China reacted quickly to what it saw as Japan’s reaffirmation of its sovereignty claim with a variety of measures, which state media called "combination punches." These ranged from Politburo members strongly denouncing Japan to Prime Minister Wen Jiabao vowing to "never yield an inch" to threats of economic retaliation to announcements of joint combat drills by China’s navy, air force and strategic missile corps, including landing exercises in the Yellow Sea and the Gobi Desert.
But a quieter move may have more serious repercussions in the end. On Sept. 10, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced baselines to formally demarcate its territorial waters in the area. In Beijing’s eyes, this move legally places the disputed islands under Chinese administration in a direct challenge to Japan’s administration of the islands over the last four decades. Since the islands reverted to Japanese government control in 1972, they have been administered by Japan.
This move is a departure from China’s previous policy of seeking joint exploitation of resources with Japan through negotiation, and also differs from China’s approach to the South China Sea, where it has maintained calculated ambiguity with regard to its claims by not fully clarifying how much of the area China actually claims as its own.
Such an unprecedented move to formalize its claim of the contested territories obliges China under its own laws — and in the court of domestic public opinion — to assert jurisdiction over the waters surrounding Diaoyu. Almost immediately after the new baselines were declared, China sent six Chinese Maritime Ocean Surveillance vessels into disputed waters on what the Foreign Ministry said was a "rights defense law enforcement action." Not to be outdone, China’s second-largest maritime law enforcement agency, the Fisheries Administration, announced plans to patrol the disputed waters, starting with protection of 1,000 Chinese fishing boats that have just left for the area.
Beijing’s tough response is catered to both domestic and international audiences. Many Chinese analysts suspect a deliberate attempt by Japan to disrupt the imminent transfer of leadership and destabilize it during a moment of vulnerability. The handover has so far been overshadowed by scandals that felled two former contenders for top spots as well as president-to-be Xi Jinping’s unexpected weeks-long disappearance from the public eye. With growing domestic dissatisfaction with the widening wealth gap, widespread corruption, rising inflation, and housing prices, combined with rampant rumors about disunity in the leadership, Beijing feels it can’t be seen to be betraying national interests in the face of its historical nemesis.
But the current nationalist outpouring significantly restricts China’s future options to dial down the situation. For all the government’s efforts at censorship and control, the internet has given the Chinese public unprecedented access to information and the tools to instantly spread commentary, eroding Beijing’s control over the ebb and flow of nationalist sentiment. Internet users can now track Chinese law enforcement vessels via satellite photos, mocking and criticizing the government when they stop short of disputed waters, holding Beijing accountable to implement statements that it may have made during a time of high public pressure but with the option of future selective enactment.
And China’s two largest maritime law enforcement agencies, which already compete with each other in the South China Sea for budget and clout, have now been further empowered to assert China’s sovereignty in the East China Sea. A former Marine Surveillance agency chief said that China’s "primary goal and task" following the baseline announcement is to drive Japan’s coast guard out of the disputed areas.
More frequent Chinese patrols in the area, along with the Japanese Coast Guard continuing to patrol near the islands, raises the risk of maritime clashes higher than it has ever been. Although the two countries have dealt with past run-ins — such as when the Japanese Coast Guard arrested a Chinese skipper in 2010 after his boat collided with a Japanese vessel — and succeeded in cooling tensions, the current situation is of a different order. That act could be attributed to an overzealous Chinese fisherman. But now, a skirmish between official law enforcement vessels in the current context could prove irresolvable.
More from Foreign Policy
At Long Last, the Foreign Service Gets the Netflix Treatment
Keri Russell gets Drexel furniture but no Senate confirmation hearing.
How Macron Is Blocking EU Strategy on Russia and China
As a strategic consensus emerges in Europe, France is in the way.
What the Bush-Obama China Memos Reveal
Newly declassified documents contain important lessons for U.S. China policy.
Russia’s Boom Business Goes Bust
Moscow’s arms exports have fallen to levels not seen since the Soviet Union’s collapse.