As an expert in post-apocalyptic political economy….

For the past ten days your humble blogger has been doing some intense work on a project that will see the light of day in the spring of 2013. This project has left your humble blogger’s brain in a state that most likely resembles tapioca pudding.  So today’s post is not gonna be about the ...

By , a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast.

For the past ten days your humble blogger has been doing some intense work on a project that will see the light of day in the spring of 2013. This project has left your humble blogger's brain in a state that most likely resembles tapioca pudding.  So today's post is not gonna be about the abstruse nature of the global economy. Instead, I wanna talk about a bad TV show. 

For the past ten days your humble blogger has been doing some intense work on a project that will see the light of day in the spring of 2013. This project has left your humble blogger’s brain in a state that most likely resembles tapioca pudding.  So today’s post is not gonna be about the abstruse nature of the global economy. Instead, I wanna talk about a bad TV show. 

The NBC/J.J.Abrams/Jon Favreau show Revolution earned respectable ratings in its premiere and follow-up episode. Your humble blogger must confess that he was intrigued enough by the trailer to check out the pilot to see what all the fuss was about. As a self-identified expert in the political economy of the apocalypse, however, I’m afraid that I must conclude that Revolution is a pile of derivative crap. 

So, the basic setup of the show is that at some point in the near future, something happens that causes all electricity to stop working, everywhere. Revolution then fast-forwards fifteen years. In the interim the United States has fallen apart, replaced with authoritarian militias like the Monroe Militia currently trying to control the Midwest.  In that area, gun ownership is banned.

The basic problem with Revolution is that it wants to to get to the post-apocalyptic world of, say, The Walking Dead, with the anarchy and the chaos and the bloddletting, but it cheats way too much on its premise to earn its world. 

I kinda like the idea of a reset in which electricity simply stops working for some malevolent reason, so I don’t exactly have the same problem that the physics geeks have with the show.  But Revolution‘s premise simply neither considers nor respects the lessons from history in trying to create it’s post-apocalyptic world.  Consider the following historical facts:

1)  Countries and empires managed to maintain something resembling territorial integrity prior to the invention of electricity;

2)  There’s this little invention called the "steam power" which really only needs fire to be able to work, that the show completely elides.  This matters one whole hell of a lot.  Steam engines can power railroads, steamships, and even cars.  So a blackout would have put some crimps in cross-country and cross-border communication — but it wouldn’t have slowed transportation all that much.  Steam power would also allow things like industrial factories and foundies to continue — albeit with considerable retooling.  All told, the odds of state collapse are actually pretty remote. 

3)  Everyone in this show is either walking or riding a horse to get around.  Now let’s assume that everyone in the world developed historical amnesia about steam power.  It’s stupid, but OK.  Where are the f**king bicycles?!  Are those not working as well? 

Now I realize that the show’s creators are more interested in promoting anything that gives this show a whiff of that Hunger Games vibe swordplay and hot young archers — not that there’s anything wrong with that.  Still, this seems like a wasted opportunity.

Coming up next time in Drezner’s TV round-up — I’ll review Last Resort.

Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner

More from Foreign Policy

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping give a toast during a reception following their talks at the Kremlin in Moscow on March 21.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping give a toast during a reception following their talks at the Kremlin in Moscow on March 21.

Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?

The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.

Xi and Putin shake hands while carrying red folders.
Xi and Putin shake hands while carrying red folders.

Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World

It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.

Russian President Vladimir Putin greets Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.
Russian President Vladimir Putin greets Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.

It’s a New Great Game. Again.

Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.

Kurdish military officers take part in a graduation ceremony in Erbil, the capital of Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, on Jan. 15.
Kurdish military officers take part in a graduation ceremony in Erbil, the capital of Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, on Jan. 15.

Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing

The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.