What our war colleges should do
My friend Richard Kohn, a distinguished historian of the American military, mentioned in a note what he thought the mission of the military’s war colleges should be: Broaden perspective, deepen understanding of war on the policy and strategy level, introduce civil-military relations at the societal and policy-strategy level, teach people how to formulate strategy, and ...
My friend Richard Kohn, a distinguished historian of the American military, mentioned in a note what he thought the mission of the military's war colleges should be:
Broaden perspective, deepen understanding of war on the policy and strategy level, introduce civil-military relations at the societal and policy-strategy level, teach people how to formulate strategy, and force a certain rigor of thought, critical reading, and skepticism through an experience of deep research and critical discourse such that when these people have high positions, they are less likely to accept conventional wisdom, clichés, sloppy thinking, superficial research, dumb ideas, and the rest. And to widen their understanding of the contemporary security environment now and likelihoods for the next decade. And make a stab at making up for a poor educational background. And attack reflexive anti-intellectualism. And more and more and more. . . .
My friend Richard Kohn, a distinguished historian of the American military, mentioned in a note what he thought the mission of the military’s war colleges should be:
Broaden perspective, deepen understanding of war on the policy and strategy level, introduce civil-military relations at the societal and policy-strategy level, teach people how to formulate strategy, and force a certain rigor of thought, critical reading, and skepticism through an experience of deep research and critical discourse such that when these people have high positions, they are less likely to accept conventional wisdom, clichés, sloppy thinking, superficial research, dumb ideas, and the rest. And to widen their understanding of the contemporary security environment now and likelihoods for the next decade. And make a stab at making up for a poor educational background. And attack reflexive anti-intellectualism. And more and more and more. . . .
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
