Pentagon downplays Allen emails
The general’s emails were “flirtatious,” but not a security breach. That’s the leading message being spun out of the Pentagon on Tuesday, where a defense official, speaking anonymously, hastily huddled reporters to offer an official description of the emails between Afghanistan war commander Gen. John Allen and Jill Kelley, the Tampa woman who allegedly was ...
The general’s emails were “flirtatious,” but not a security breach.
The general’s emails were “flirtatious,” but not a security breach.
That’s the leading message being spun out of the Pentagon on Tuesday, where a defense official, speaking anonymously, hastily huddled reporters to offer an official description of the emails between Afghanistan war commander Gen. John Allen and Jill Kelley, the Tampa woman who allegedly was being harassed by former CIA Director David Petraeus’s mistress.
“They’re not security-related. They’re not, I don’t know, information about acquisition or contracting. They’re not hate or threatening. We picked that word to kind of help put it into a category,” said the official.
The word describes 20,000 to 30,000 pages of emails now under investigation by the Defense Department inspector general, revealed in a statement by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta early Tuesday morning. Panetta is traveling in Asia, and the Allen investigation was revealed to reporters aboard his airplane en route to Australia.
The emails were described as “current,” running from 2010 through this year, but the official was hesitant to characterize just how explicit was the language between the general and the Florida socialite.
“‘Flirtatious’ can cover everything from something fairly innocuous all the way over to something — sexting.”
“He has denied he had an affair,” said the official, of Allen. “I believe he has told the chairman [of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey].” Secretary Panetta has not spoken with Allen, the official added.
President Obama has "faith" in Allen, White House spokesman Jay Carney said on Tuesday. Carney said the White House had no personnel changes to announce relating to the scandals and cautioned against "extrapolating" from the Allen and Petraeus cases any wider misconduct across the officer corps.
Still, the massive volume of correspondence warrants the inspector general’s investigation to determine if they indeed violated a military code, namely “conduct that would bring discredit to the service,” according to the defense official.
Allen was in Washington when the scandal broke, where he was preparing for a Thursday confirmation hearing to become the next NATO commander. That nomination is now on hold, but Allen remains scheduled to return to Kabul on Saturday, the official said. “He is entitled to due process in this matter,” Panetta said in his statement.
Allen delivered his long-awaited recommendations for how President Obama should prosecute the war in Afghanistan through 2014, it was revealed on Monday. Panetta said the Pentagon and White House have begun their review of those recommendations, which have not been made public.
Gen. John Dunford is still scheduled to keep his Thursday confirmation hearing appointment with the Senate Armed Services Committee to become Allen’s replacement as COMISAF. Reportedly, Dunford was supposed take command from Allen in February. By law, Allen has to give up the command within 60 days of Dunford’s confirmation by the full Senate, which could slide the change-of-command deadline into January.
Though Panetta, in his Tuesday statement, requested the Senate to “act promptly” on Dunford’s nomination, the official said, “The secretary has not made indication that he is going to change the timeline.”
Kevin Baron is a national security reporter for Foreign Policy, covering defense and military issues in Washington. He is also vice president of the Pentagon Press Association. Baron previously was a national security staff writer for National Journal, covering the "business of war." Prior to that, Baron worked in the resident daily Pentagon press corps as a reporter/photographer for Stars and Stripes. For three years with Stripes, Baron covered the building and traveled overseas extensively with the secretary of defense and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, covering official visits to Afghanistan and Iraq, the Middle East and Europe, China, Japan and South Korea, in more than a dozen countries. From 2004 to 2009, Baron was the Boston Globe Washington bureau's investigative projects reporter, covering defense, international affairs, lobbying and other issues. Before that, he muckraked at the Center for Public Integrity. Baron has reported on assignment from Asia, Africa, Australia, Europe, the Middle East and the South Pacific. He was won two Polk Awards, among other honors. He has a B.A. in international studies from the University of Richmond and M.A. in media and public affairs from George Washington University. Originally from Orlando, Fla., Baron has lived in the Washington area since 1998 and currently resides in Northern Virginia with his wife, three sons, and the family dog, The Edge. Twitter: @FPBaron
More from Foreign Policy
Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?
The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.
Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World
It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.
It’s a New Great Game. Again.
Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.
Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
