Congress moves to bar Pentagon from deals with Russian arms exporter
The Senate voted unanimously Thursday night to bar the Pentagon from using U.S. taxpayer funds to purchase any goods from the Russia’s main arms exporter, including helicopters for use in Afghanistan. Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) submitted an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act barring the Pentagon from spending any money in fiscal 2013 on ...
The Senate voted unanimously Thursday night to bar the Pentagon from using U.S. taxpayer funds to purchase any goods from the Russia's main arms exporter, including helicopters for use in Afghanistan.
The Senate voted unanimously Thursday night to bar the Pentagon from using U.S. taxpayer funds to purchase any goods from the Russia’s main arms exporter, including helicopters for use in Afghanistan.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) submitted an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act barring the Pentagon from spending any money in fiscal 2013 on contracts with Rosoboronexport, the Russian state-controlled arms export firm that has been facilitating arms shipments to the Syrian regime since the brutal crackdown on Syrian civilians began early last year.
"The American taxpayer should not be indirectly subsidizing the mass murder of Syrian civilians, especially when there are perfectly good alternatives for purchasing these same arms through U.S. brokers," Cornyn said in a statement. "Continuing this robust business relationship with Rosoboronexport would continue to undermine U.S. policy on Syria and U.S. efforts to stand with the Syrian people."
Outrage over the Pentagon’s dealings with Rosoboronexport has been building on Capitol Hill since March, when 17 senators wrote to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to demand an end to U.S. arms deals with the Russian firm.
Russia has supplied more than $1 billion of arms to the Syrian government since the unrest is Syria began, the senators wrote — including four cargo ships full of weapons that have arrived in Syria since December. Rosoboronexport is Russia’s official broker, serving as a middle man for all Russian foreign defense sales. It reportedly signed a new contract with the Syrian regime for 36 combat jets in January.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Army is in the middle of buying 21 Mi-17 dual-use helicopters from Rosoboronexport for the Afghan security forces. That $375 million deal was granted through a sole-source contract that was never competitively bid, according to Wired. The administration has said Rosoboronexport was the only broker for the helicopters, which it says the Afghan military needs.
The firm is also bidding to sell ammunition to U.S. forces. The U.S. government had halted arms deals with Rosoboronexport from 2006 to 2010 due to concerns the company was contributing to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction due to its arms sales to Iran. Those sanctions were lifted in 2010 when Russia backed United Nations Security Council sanctions against Iran.
In July, Democratic Congressman Jim Moran (D-VA) successfully added similar language barring Pentagon contracts with Rosoboronexport to the House’s version of the fiscal 2013 defense appropriations bill. That amendment was adopted by a vote of 407-5.
The Senate is expected to pass the defense authorization bill Friday, after which it must be reconciled with the House version before being sent to the president’s des.
"Senator Cornyn has demonstrated tremendous leadership in targeting the enablers of Syria’s atrocities. We are thrilled that his work on this issue over the last year – from bringing attention to the troublesome U.S.-Rosoboronexport relationship to building a bipartisan coalition – has culminated in the passage of this amendment in the Senate," said Human Rights First’s Winny Chen. "We look forward to working with other human rights champions in Congress to end U.S. business relationships with enablers of Syria’s mass atrocities."
Josh Rogin covers national security and foreign policy and writes the daily Web column The Cable. His column appears bi-weekly in the print edition of The Washington Post. He can be reached for comments or tips at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Previously, Josh covered defense and foreign policy as a staff writer for Congressional Quarterly, writing extensively on Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantánamo Bay, U.S.-Asia relations, defense budgeting and appropriations, and the defense lobbying and contracting industries. Prior to that, he covered military modernization, cyber warfare, space, and missile defense for Federal Computer Week Magazine. He has also served as Pentagon Staff Reporter for the Asahi Shimbun, Japan's leading daily newspaper, in its Washington, D.C., bureau, where he reported on U.S.-Japan relations, Chinese military modernization, the North Korean nuclear crisis, and more.
A graduate of George Washington University's Elliott School of International Affairs, Josh lived in Yokohama, Japan, and studied at Tokyo's Sophia University. He speaks conversational Japanese and has reported from the region. He has also worked at the House International Relations Committee, the Embassy of Japan, and the Brookings Institution.
Josh's reporting has been featured on CNN, MSNBC, C-Span, CBS, ABC, NPR, WTOP, and several other outlets. He was a 2008-2009 National Press Foundation's Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellow, 2009 military reporting fellow with the Knight Center for Specialized Journalism and the 2011 recipient of the InterAction Award for Excellence in International Reporting. He hails from Philadelphia and lives in Washington, D.C. Twitter: @joshrogin
More from Foreign Policy
Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?
The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.
Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World
It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.
It’s a New Great Game. Again.
Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.
Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.