The Cable

The Cable goes inside the foreign policy machine, from Foggy Bottom to Turtle Bay, the White House to Embassy Row.

McCain to join Foreign Relations Committee just before Sec State hearing

MANAMA – The committee that will soon vet the next secretary of state will have a new Republican heavyweight next year: Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), the man leading the charge against potential nominee U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice. McCain told The Cable he will join the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) and also remain on the ...

Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Mark Wilson/Getty Images

MANAMA - The committee that will soon vet the next secretary of state will have a new Republican heavyweight next year: Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), the man leading the charge against potential nominee U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice.

McCain told The Cable he will join the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) and also remain on the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) in an interview on the sidelines of the 2012 IISS Manama Security Dialogue.

MANAMA – The committee that will soon vet the next secretary of state will have a new Republican heavyweight next year: Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), the man leading the charge against potential nominee U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice.

McCain told The Cable he will join the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) and also remain on the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) in an interview on the sidelines of the 2012 IISS Manama Security Dialogue.

McCain, who finishes his six-year term as ranking Republican on the SASC this year, will not challenge Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) for the leadership post on the SFRC, but his presence will be felt, especially during the confirmation hearings, which could be especially contentious this time around if Rice is chosen as the nominee. Those nomination hearings would be chaired by Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) — that is, unless Kerry gets the nod himself.

White House sources insist there’s no way to know who President Barack Obama will ultimately choose, but the stakes are rising in the ongoing feud between the White House and the anti-Rice crowd in the Senate, which is led by McCain. Neither side is backing down, and McCain says he wants to expand his inquiry past Rice’s Sept. 16 comments about the terrorist attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi.

"I have some concerns about what happened in Africa under her watch. All that has not been examined," he said, referring to Rice’s role in shaping U.S. policy during the Clinton administration. Her involvement in decisions relating to the Rwandan genocide and her close ties to several African leaders are now being poured over by journalists around the world.

Rice is also facing scrutiny for her investments in TransCanada, a company involved in the Keystone Pipeline project, and her investments with several companies that do business in Iran. Her defender say she has properly disclosed her investment.

  • The White House is convinced the whirlwind of negative coverage is a coordinated effort by the Republican political machine to sink the Rice nomination before it even surfaces.

    "I would commend Republican opposition researchers for the intellectual bandwidth that is required to read a financial disclosure form, because this was all documented in a financial disclosure form, entirely, appropriately, legally and by the books," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Nov. 29. "So what this represents I think in vivid fashion is what I’ve been talking about for a while now, which is that none of this has anything to do with the tragedy that occurred in Benghazi.  This is about politics.  And that’s a shame."

    The fight is getting personal. After McCain called Rice "not very bright," a group of African American congresswomen called McCain "sexist and racist" and House Minority Deputy Whip James Clyburn (D-MD) said McCain was using racial code words.

    Democrats defending Rice also note that McCain made arguments in the past supporting the president’s right to have his nominees confirmed.

    "I believe there are significant numbers of the American people who do take into consideration the consequences of a presidential election, and that is the earned right of a president, under anything other than unusual circumstances, to pick his team," McCain said in 2005, during the fight over the nomination of U.N. Ambassador John Bolton.

    Bolton stood accused of pressuring State Department analysts and the CIA to alter their intelligence assessments regarding Iraq’s WMD capabilities in the run up to the Iraq war. He ultimately was not confirmed and served for one year under a recess appointment.

    It’s unclear whether the five or six Senate Republicans who have come out against Rice’s potential nomination would succeed in their effort to thwart her nomination, if it materializes. McCain said the Senate should use the confirmation process to properly examine the president’s choice, and he pointed to her SFRC hearing as the place for the final showdown.

    "I’ll wait and see if she’s nominated and we’ll move on from there. She has the right to have hearings. We’ll see what happens in the hearings," he said.

    When asked why he wanted to join the Foreign Relations Committee, McCain joked, "Because I want to spend more time with you, Josh."

    UPDATE: McCain spokesman Brian Rogers writes in to say that next year’s committee assignements are not yet final and the leadership has the final say.

    "Senator McCain has expressed interest in joining the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, but no final decisions on committee assignments have been made," Rogers said.

  • Josh Rogin covers national security and foreign policy and writes the daily Web column The Cable. His column appears bi-weekly in the print edition of The Washington Post. He can be reached for comments or tips at josh.rogin@foreignpolicy.com.

    Previously, Josh covered defense and foreign policy as a staff writer for Congressional Quarterly, writing extensively on Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantánamo Bay, U.S.-Asia relations, defense budgeting and appropriations, and the defense lobbying and contracting industries. Prior to that, he covered military modernization, cyber warfare, space, and missile defense for Federal Computer Week Magazine. He has also served as Pentagon Staff Reporter for the Asahi Shimbun, Japan's leading daily newspaper, in its Washington, D.C., bureau, where he reported on U.S.-Japan relations, Chinese military modernization, the North Korean nuclear crisis, and more.

    A graduate of George Washington University's Elliott School of International Affairs, Josh lived in Yokohama, Japan, and studied at Tokyo's Sophia University. He speaks conversational Japanese and has reported from the region. He has also worked at the House International Relations Committee, the Embassy of Japan, and the Brookings Institution.

    Josh's reporting has been featured on CNN, MSNBC, C-Span, CBS, ABC, NPR, WTOP, and several other outlets. He was a 2008-2009 National Press Foundation's Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellow, 2009 military reporting fellow with the Knight Center for Specialized Journalism and the 2011 recipient of the InterAction Award for Excellence in International Reporting. He hails from Philadelphia and lives in Washington, D.C. Twitter: @joshrogin

    More from Foreign Policy

    Bill Clinton and Joe Biden  at a meeting of the U.S. Congressional delegation to the NATO summit in Spain on July 7, 1998.

    Liberal Illusions Caused the Ukraine Crisis

    The greatest tragedy about Russia’s potential invasion is how easily it could have been avoided.

    A report card is superimposed over U.S. President Joe Biden.

    Is Biden’s Foreign Policy Grade A Material?

    More than 30 experts grade the U.S. president’s first year of foreign policy.

    White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan gives a press briefing.

    Defining the Biden Doctrine

    U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan sat down with FP to talk about Russia, China, relations with Europe, and year one of the Biden presidency.

    Ukrainian servicemen taking part in the armed conflict with Russia-backed separatists in Donetsk region of the country attend the handover ceremony of military heavy weapons and equipment in Kiev on November 15, 2018.

    The West’s Weapons Won’t Make Any Difference to Ukraine

    U.S. military equipment wouldn’t realistically help Ukrainians—or intimidate Putin.