Fiscal cliff deal leaves Pentagon sour, still eyeing sequestration
There is no joy in Pentagon-ville. Defense Department officials voiced pointed frustration with Congress on Wednesday, one day after lawmakers passed a so-called “fiscal cliff “ deal that put off the automatic budget cuts known as “sequestration” for just two months, leaving up to 800,000 civilian DOD employees still facing furlough notices. Defense Secretary Leon ...
There is no joy in Pentagon-ville.
There is no joy in Pentagon-ville.
Defense Department officials voiced pointed frustration with Congress on Wednesday, one day after lawmakers passed a so-called “fiscal cliff “ deal that put off the automatic budget cuts known as “sequestration” for just two months, leaving up to 800,000 civilian DOD employees still facing furlough notices.
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, a former White House budget director and chairman of the House Budget Committee, in a statement wryly thanked Congress for finding additional time to avoid sequestration, which was due to take effect on Jan. 2. Congress has had more than one year to find a way to address the 2011 Budget Control Act’s call for across-the-board defense spending cuts totaling $600 billion over 10 years, or nearly $60 billion this year alone, which military officials have said would cripple national security functions.
“For more than a year, I have made clear that sequestration would have a devastating impact on the [Defense] Department,” Panetta said, in a statement. “Over the past few weeks, as we were forced to begin preparing to implement this law, my concerns about its damaging effects have only grown.”
Chief among those concerns has been which of the department’s functions could be abandoned or delayed, and which employees would be first in line for job furloughs.
“This is not an abstract concept,” said Pentagon press secretary George Little, briefing reporters Wednesday morning. “This is something that will have an impact on real people doing real work on real missions for this department.”
“Congress,” Panetta said, “has prevented the worst possible outcome by delaying sequestration for two months. Unfortunately, the cloud of sequestration remains. The responsibility now is to eliminate it as a threat by enacting balanced deficit reduction. Congress cannot continue to just kick the can down the road.”
But that’s a warning Panetta has uttered before, and it’s precisely what Congress did, with late night Senate and House votes over New Year’s Eve and New Year’s Day.
House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon (R-CA) also blasted the fiscal cliff deal for leaving sequestration hanging over commanders’ heads. But, in a Tuesday statement, McKeon put the onus on President Obama, saying, “It is unfortunate that President Obama missed an opportunity to honor the promise he made to our military and veterans, when he assured us all that sequestration would not happen.”
Little said the deal left DOD officials still determining how many and which of the 800,000 employees actually would need to receive furlough notices. If Congress misses this new deadline, DOD employees would be laid off in rotations to meet the spending cut requirements, but those numbers have not been determined, Little said.
In one way, delaying sequester by two months makes DOD planners’ jobs more difficult, Little argued. If a new deal is not reached, the window for cutting enough spending during this fiscal year only gets smaller, and therefore the cuts must be more severe.
“If you do the math, then you get to a point where you have to spread the furloughs across a relatively wide swath of the DOD civilian population in order to achieve the savings required under sequester. So, I don’t have a precise number," he said, of employees or how many days in advance the Pentagon would be required to give notices. “I don’t know if it’s 100,000 or 200,000. I don’t how many days, but it’s something we had to look at.”
Additionally, Pentagon budget writers are still figuring out the deal’s impact on the fiscal year 2014 budget request, which historically is released January or February.
Kevin Baron is a national security reporter for Foreign Policy, covering defense and military issues in Washington. He is also vice president of the Pentagon Press Association. Baron previously was a national security staff writer for National Journal, covering the "business of war." Prior to that, Baron worked in the resident daily Pentagon press corps as a reporter/photographer for Stars and Stripes. For three years with Stripes, Baron covered the building and traveled overseas extensively with the secretary of defense and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, covering official visits to Afghanistan and Iraq, the Middle East and Europe, China, Japan and South Korea, in more than a dozen countries. From 2004 to 2009, Baron was the Boston Globe Washington bureau's investigative projects reporter, covering defense, international affairs, lobbying and other issues. Before that, he muckraked at the Center for Public Integrity. Baron has reported on assignment from Asia, Africa, Australia, Europe, the Middle East and the South Pacific. He was won two Polk Awards, among other honors. He has a B.A. in international studies from the University of Richmond and M.A. in media and public affairs from George Washington University. Originally from Orlando, Fla., Baron has lived in the Washington area since 1998 and currently resides in Northern Virginia with his wife, three sons, and the family dog, The Edge. Twitter: @FPBaron
More from Foreign Policy
At Long Last, the Foreign Service Gets the Netflix Treatment
Keri Russell gets Drexel furniture but no Senate confirmation hearing.
How Macron Is Blocking EU Strategy on Russia and China
As a strategic consensus emerges in Europe, France is in the way.
What the Bush-Obama China Memos Reveal
Newly declassified documents contain important lessons for U.S. China policy.
Russia’s Boom Business Goes Bust
Moscow’s arms exports have fallen to levels not seen since the Soviet Union’s collapse.