Ian Bremmer, Vladimir Putin, and the Russian media looking glass

ForeignPolicy.com is getting a little more .ru traffic today, since the Russian media seems to have picked up on Ian Bremmer’s list of the world’s most powerful people. The Eurasia Group president’s tongue-in-cheek post on the organization’s FP blog, The Call, lists "nobody" as the world’s most powerful person — no surprise to regular Bremmer ...

ForeignPolicy.com is getting a little more .ru traffic today, since the Russian media seems to have picked up on Ian Bremmer's list of the world's most powerful people. The Eurasia Group president's tongue-in-cheek post on the organization's FP blog, The Call, lists "nobody" as the world's most powerful person -- no surprise to regular Bremmer readers -- and Russian President Vladimir Putin at No. 2. But Bremmer's write-up isn't exactly complimentary: 

In Russia's personalized system, this is still the person who counts. He isn't as popular as he used to be, and his country has no Soviet-scale clout or influence, but no one on the planet has consolidated more domestic and regional power than Putin. 

But in Russia's state-controlled media, an FP blogger noting that Russia's political system has no checks or balances became Foreign Policy magazine bestowing an honor on Putin. Here's the wire service ITAR-TASS:

ForeignPolicy.com is getting a little more .ru traffic today, since the Russian media seems to have picked up on Ian Bremmer’s list of the world’s most powerful people. The Eurasia Group president’s tongue-in-cheek post on the organization’s FP blog, The Call, lists "nobody" as the world’s most powerful person — no surprise to regular Bremmer readers — and Russian President Vladimir Putin at No. 2. But Bremmer’s write-up isn’t exactly complimentary: 

In Russia’s personalized system, this is still the person who counts. He isn’t as popular as he used to be, and his country has no Soviet-scale clout or influence, but no one on the planet has consolidated more domestic and regional power than Putin. 

But in Russia’s state-controlled media, an FP blogger noting that Russia’s political system has no checks or balances became Foreign Policy magazine bestowing an honor on Putin. Here’s the wire service ITAR-TASS:

Foreign Policy magazine names Putin as most influential politician

LONDON, January 4 (Itar-Tass) — President Vladimir Putin of Russia has been named by the Foreign Policy magazine as the world’s most influential political, business, and public figure.

A regular issue of the magazine, which carries a list of ratings of persons who determine ways for the development of the present-day world, appeared on sale on Friday.

Of course, there are a few things that aren’t right about this. It wasn’t "Foreign Policy," but one FP blogger, it’s not an annual feature, and the item did not appear in the print magazine. Plus, the writer conveniently leaves out Bremmer’s not-so-flattering reason for putting Putin on the list. 

Voice of Russia expands on the story, bringing in some expert opinions: 

In a prompt commentary, Director of the Moscow-based Socioeconomic and Political Research Institute Professor Dmitry Badovsky has said he believes Russia’s presidency of the G20 in 2013 should help the Russian President retain this enviable position.

Russian analysts believe the American foreign policy now has to take what they call ‘the long-term Putin factor’ into account.

Head of the Politology Department of Moscow’s High Economic School Professor Leonid Polyakov spoke about this in Moscow Friday after the Foreign Policy magazine ranked Russian President Vladimir Putin the most influential world leader of 2012.

Interestingly, Putin occupies Spot Two in the magazine’s table, while Spot One is empty. Professor Polyakov believes this betrays American reluctance to recognize a non-American as the world’s top kick.

Right, we’d never put a non-American at the top of any list. 

To their credit, Russian state-sponsored broadcaster RT got the story right, specifying that it was Eurasia Group, not FP, that came up with the list.

Some backlash to the initial coverage has already started. Leonid Storch, blogger from the independent and often critical Echo Moskvy radio station, actually looked at the website, saw the original context of the ranking, and pronounced all the hype around the list "overcooked" and the result of the media’s "inability to verify information and overconfidence in the printed word."

Perhaps, though it’s hardly a problem unique to Russia.

Joshua Keating was an associate editor at Foreign Policy  Twitter: @joshuakeating

More from Foreign Policy

A destroyed building in Ukraine
A destroyed building in Ukraine

Ukraine’s War Has Already Changed the World’s Economy

Global economics will never be the same—but not in the ways you might think.

china-russia-ukraine-war-sebastien-thibault-illustration-foreign-policy-hero
china-russia-ukraine-war-sebastien-thibault-illustration-foreign-policy-hero

What Lessons Does China Take From Putin’s War?

A month into the invasion, Beijing is still backing Russia.

The Russian and Chinese national flags are seen on the table as Russia's President Vladimir Putin and his China's President Xi Jinping stand during a signing ceremony at the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse in Beijing on Nov. 9, 2014.
The Russian and Chinese national flags are seen on the table as Russia's President Vladimir Putin and his China's President Xi Jinping stand during a signing ceremony at the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse in Beijing on Nov. 9, 2014.

Opposing China Means Defeating Russia

Moscow’s war isn’t a distraction. It’s part and parcel of the threat posed by Beijing.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, French President Emmanuel Macron and Russian President Vladimir Putin arrive for a meeting on Ukraine with German Chancellor at the Elysee Palace, on December 9, 2019 in Paris.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, French President Emmanuel Macron and Russian President Vladimir Putin arrive for a meeting on Ukraine with German Chancellor at the Elysee Palace, on December 9, 2019 in Paris.

The Meaning of Ukraine’s Coming Neutrality

History offers clear examples of what neutral status means—and what it doesn’t.