Last questions about COIN (X): Is it time for a truth and reconciliation commission?
By Major Tom Mcilwaine, Queen’s Royal Hussars Best Defense guest columnist Question Set Ten — Do we really want to be doing this? COIN, or whatever it is that we have been doing over the last decade, is tremendously difficult. The direction of some of these questions suggests that it might be a little bit ...
By Major Tom Mcilwaine, Queen's Royal Hussars
Best Defense guest columnist
By Major Tom Mcilwaine, Queen’s Royal Hussars
Best Defense guest columnist
Question Set Ten — Do we really want to be doing this? COIN, or whatever it is that we have been doing over the last decade, is tremendously difficult. The direction of some of these questions suggests that it might be a little bit more than that though. If what we are doing is fundamentally imperial, then it raises two extra questions. First, can we do this without using imperial methods? Second, do we want to use those methods? Is the price we might pay to alter the behavior of the population of Yemen (in terms of what it requires us to do) worth paying? If I am correct, then what we are doing perhaps takes us into some areas that morally we might not wish to go. Failing to ask ourselves some hard questions about what we have done and what we should have done will lead politicians to believe that we can somehow do it without doing bad things — which means that they are more likely to want to do it in the future. Precision munitions surely contribute to this as they have been sold as making war clean. Perhaps we should restrict their use for COIN fights to make politicians realize that wars really are nasty? Politicians should understand that going to war is a terrible thing, something I am not sure the COIN’dinistia philosophy makes clear enough.
And that is the final issue I would like to raise: As we move away from the conflicts of the last decade it is not enough simply to return to our combined arms heritage — however necessary that might be. Nor is it enough to log the current narrative on what is required for COIN success in our institutional memory bank, and return to it when we next face a similar threat. What is required, if we are not to make the same mistakes that we made this time, is a comprehensive examination of what it is we were trying to achieve, what we needed to do to achieve it, and whether we really wanted to travel down this path, or want to now or in the future.
A place to advocate some truth and reconciliation rather than escalating the intellectual holy war within our profession might help too.
Major Tom Mcilwaine is a British Army officer who is currently a student at the School of Advanced Military Studies at Ft Leavenworth. He has deployed to Iraq as a Platoon Commander and Battalion Operations and Intelligence Officer, to Bosnia as Aide to the Commander of European Forces and to Afghanistan as a Plans Officer with I MEF(Fwd). Consider this the standard disclaimer.
More from Foreign Policy
Lessons for the Next War
Twelve experts weigh in on how to prevent, deter, and—if necessary—fight the next conflict.
It’s High Time to Prepare for Russia’s Collapse
Not planning for the possibility of disintegration betrays a dangerous lack of imagination.
Turkey Is Sending Cold War-Era Cluster Bombs to Ukraine
The artillery-fired cluster munitions could be lethal to Russian troops—and Ukrainian civilians.
Congrats, You’re a Member of Congress. Now Listen Up.
Some brief foreign-policy advice for the newest members of the U.S. legislature.