Mattis wants 13,600 after 2014

Gen. James Mattis, commander of U.S. Central Command, wants 13,600 U.S. troops to remain in Afghanistan beyond 2014, the military’s target deadline for ending combat operations. Mattis revealed for the first time publicly his recommended footprint for post-war Afghanistan in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday. After 2014, the U.S. and its ...

By , a former staff writer at Foreign Policy.
Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call
Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call
Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call

Gen. James Mattis, commander of U.S. Central Command, wants 13,600 U.S. troops to remain in Afghanistan beyond 2014, the military’s target deadline for ending combat operations.

Gen. James Mattis, commander of U.S. Central Command, wants 13,600 U.S. troops to remain in Afghanistan beyond 2014, the military’s target deadline for ending combat operations.

Mattis revealed for the first time publicly his recommended footprint for post-war Afghanistan in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday. After 2014, the U.S. and its NATO allies want to keep some number of conventional and special operations troops for some years in Afghanistan, maintaining a forward presence from which to continue hunting terrorist networks along the Pakistan border and train Afghan security forces. The only question has been how many troops will contributing nations and the government Afghanistan agree to support. Mattis said he assumed NATO would provide about 50 percent of the 13,600, if accepted.

Two weeks ago, in Brussels, NATO defense ministers, including Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, deliberated leaving a training force behind sized at roughly 8,000 to 12,000 NATO troops, including Americans. Since January, published reports have described White House officials as considering a deployed force of between 3,000 and 9,000 U.S. troops.

In the Pentagon, defense officials have been eager to describe how they are deliberating over potential size of the “residual force," but they have been less willing to discuss the exact size of the American fighting force to be kept in country this year, a decision solely in the hands of President Obama.

There are 66,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan presently. President Obama, in January’s State of the Union Address, announced that 34,000 troops would be withdrawn by next January. Panetta said in Belgium that more than 60,000 would remain through the summer’s annual so-called fighting season. Another bulk drawdown is expected after the April 2014 Afghan presidential elections, Panetta said.

“There may be more reductions we could take,” Mattis told Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), in the next four years through 2018, if Afghan forces continue to train up at their current rate. Mattis testified alongside Adm. Bill McRaven, commander of Special Operations Command.

Kevin Baron is a former staff writer at Foreign Policy. Twitter: @FPBaron

More from Foreign Policy

Children are hooked up to IV drips on the stairs at a children's hospital in Beijing.
Children are hooked up to IV drips on the stairs at a children's hospital in Beijing.

Chinese Hospitals Are Housing Another Deadly Outbreak

Authorities are covering up the spread of antibiotic-resistant pneumonia.

Henry Kissinger during an interview in Washington in August 1980.
Henry Kissinger during an interview in Washington in August 1980.

Henry Kissinger, Colossus on the World Stage

The late statesman was a master of realpolitik—whom some regarded as a war criminal.

A Ukrainian soldier in helmet and fatigues holds a cell phone and looks up at the night sky as an explosion lights up the horizon behind him.
A Ukrainian soldier in helmet and fatigues holds a cell phone and looks up at the night sky as an explosion lights up the horizon behind him.

The West’s False Choice in Ukraine

The crossroads is not between war and compromise, but between victory and defeat.

Illustrated portraits of Reps. MIke Gallagher, right, and Raja Krishnamoorthi
Illustrated portraits of Reps. MIke Gallagher, right, and Raja Krishnamoorthi

The Masterminds

Washington wants to get tough on China, and the leaders of the House China Committee are in the driver’s seat.