The Long Shadow
Venezuela’s upcoming election features a young challenger against Hugo Chávez’s appointed successor -- who’s doing everything in his power to make the race about his dead boss.
CARACAS — Venezuelan presidential candidate Henrique Capriles Radonski is hoping to complete a trifecta of victories against the country's vice presidents in next month's election to choose a successor to fallen leader Hugo Chávez.
CARACAS — Venezuelan presidential candidate Henrique Capriles Radonski is hoping to complete a trifecta of victories against the country’s vice presidents in next month’s election to choose a successor to fallen leader Hugo Chávez.
Back in 2008, Capriles upset Chávez’s right hand man and former Vice President Diosdado Cabello — now head of the national assembly — and was elected governor of the populous state of Miranda. Last December, he bested another former vice president, Elías Jaua — now foreign minister — to win reelection.
Both of these were impressive victories — the government spent heavily in hopes of ousting him — but the third victory will undoubtedly be the toughest. Capriles, who is regarded as the opposition’s best, and perhaps only, hope to retake the country’s presidency, is facing acting President Nicolás Maduro, whom Chávez chose as his vice president in October. In addition to access to the substantial resources of the state, Maduro is riding high on a wave of public sympathy for Chávez, who died March 5 after a two-year bout with cancer. It’s also Capriles’s second presidential race in less than a year: Chávez beat him last October, though it was the closest-fought campaign of the late president’s 14-year tenure.
"The election is going to be a referendum on what kind of man, what kind of president Hugo Chávez was," said Ray Walzer, a fellow at the Washington-based Heritage Foundation. "The problem for Capriles is that Venezuela is in a post-Chávez hangover now."
Polls matching Capriles and Maduro and taken before Chávez´s death showed the latter with a strong double-digit lead, ranging from 10 to 15 percentage points. However, Capriles has come out swinging this time, in marked contrast to his race last year when some advisors felt he was too deferential to the ailing president and didn’t attack Chávez’s policies enough. They also faulted him for not responding to Chávez’s personal insults.
"Candidate Capriles is going to be much more forceful this time, more direct and questioning," said an advisor to the challenger, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "Last time he was too polite, which was viewed as a weakness. This time, the gloves are off."
Capriles has wasted no time on going on the attack since accepting the nomination from the opposition coalition front to contest the April 14 election. He has repeatedly charged that Maduro, 50, lied to the Venezuelans about the date and circumstances of Chávez’s death, to give himself more time to fortify his position. His stump speech hammers the acting president, claiming that Maduro’s first 100 days in office have been a disaster, highlighted by the decision to devalue the country’s currency by 32 percent.
"Nicolás has been campaigning ever since President Hugo Chávez went for his treatment," Capriles said in a meeting on March 12 with journalists. "We’re already 100 days into Nicolas’s government and look where our country is going. He is a bad imitation of the president."
There is little love lost between the two men. During last year’s campaign, Maduro insinuated that Capriles, who is single, was gay. Other Maduro backers have whispered that Capriles is Jewish, which he isn’t.
Maduro stepped up the accusations in early March, internationalizing the dispute, when he said that Capriles had gone to the United States to conspire to overthrow the government with the collusion of U.S. intelligence agents. Capriles said the trip (he visited Miami and New York the week prior to Chávez’s death) was to visit family members, and tweeted photos of himself with his nephews.
Now, and somewhat bizarrely, Maduro has accused Washington of plotting the assassination of Capriles. The government has already expelled U.S. officials and just suspended talks to improve relations between Washington and Caracas following U.S. Undersecretary of State for Latin America Roberta Jacobson’s call for Venezuela to stage free and transparent elections.
Capriles makes no secret of his disdain for Maduro, constantly calling him by his first name and refusing to refer to him as president, noting that he was never elected to the position. He accuses Maduro of hiding behind Chávez’s image to avoid taking blame for bad decisions.
Maduro counters by accusing Capriles of dishonoring Chávez’s memory and of being disrespectful to the president’s family. (He was neither invited nor allowed to attend the funeral.) Maduro has also been careful to identify himself as "a son of Chávez," and constantly sprinkles his speeches with references to the fallen leader. He often speaks in public with a picture of Chávez in the background, looking over his shoulder, much like his old boss did with Simon Bolivar.
"Maduro isn’t Chávez but then he doesn’t need to be," said David Smilde, a senior fellow at the Washington Office for Latin America. "He is still basking in the glow of Chávez."
Smilde noted that Capriles needs to stop mentioning Chávez as the root of all ills, and start sharing his plans for the future. Venezuela’s economy and soaring crime are the issues that resonate most with voters. Since the devaluation, prices have soared. Although the official exchange rate is 6.3 bolivars to the dollar, it was trading at 26 on the black market in the days after Chávez’s death before falling back to 23.50. Basic foodstuffs such as coffee, sugar, cooking oil, corn meal, and meat — the prices of which are set by the government — remain scarce.
"I may be a Chavista," said Nora Alvarez, a 28-year-old housewife waiting in line outside a supermarket in Caracas. "But this is ridiculous. I am wasting four hours just to buy 4 kilograms of corn meal. We never went through this before."
Crime is also surging. Maduro said last week that he would seek to talk to the leaders of Venezuela’s crime gangs to convince them put down their arms. Failing that, he said he would send in the police, national guard, and army to hunt them down. Capriles and members of the opposition ridiculed Maduro’s entreaty, saying it was unrealistic to hope the gangs would voluntarily give up their life of crime.
"This election is an important one for Capriles and the opposition to get their ideas out there, to get a message to the country that they have alternative policies, and ideas for the country," said Smilde. "Then he will be in a position in the future, when things get tough for Maduro, to offer Venezuelans a different path, a different message."
So far, however, Maduro is sticking with a simple message: I am the heir to Chávez; stick with me. Maduro’s campaign literature prominently features a picture of Chávez’s above the words "Maduro from the heart." Occasionally, the imitation verges on self-parody. Maduro has started singing at public appearances, just as Chávez did and has started tweeting.
But Maduro may have lost perhaps the key prop in his election bid. It may be too late to embalm Chávez’s body to have it placed on permanent display, Maduro said last weekend. The government had planned to place the former president’s remains in a glass case so h
e could inspire future generations and influence elections.
"There are difficulties and those difficulties may make it impossible to do what they did to Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, or Mao," Maduro said.
But Maduro’s backers may not need the former president’s corpse to win. They are spending freely to get their message out, plastering Chávez’s image in their campaign signs and advertisements. El Comandante may not be there in person but his shadow and memory still looms large.
More from Foreign Policy
No, the World Is Not Multipolar
The idea of emerging power centers is popular but wrong—and could lead to serious policy mistakes.
America Prepares for a Pacific War With China It Doesn’t Want
Embedded with U.S. forces in the Pacific, I saw the dilemmas of deterrence firsthand.
America Can’t Stop China’s Rise
And it should stop trying.
The Morality of Ukraine’s War Is Very Murky
The ethical calculations are less clear than you might think.