The Army and the mirror
Does anyone know of any official Army publication that critiques and compares the performance of Army generals in Iraq? I can’t remember any, but 10 years is a long time and there is a chance I have forgotten something. I don’t mean individual articles in Military Review or papers written at the Command and General ...
Does anyone know of any official Army publication that critiques and compares the performance of Army generals in Iraq? I can't remember any, but 10 years is a long time and there is a chance I have forgotten something.
Does anyone know of any official Army publication that critiques and compares the performance of Army generals in Iraq? I can’t remember any, but 10 years is a long time and there is a chance I have forgotten something.
I don’t mean individual articles in Military Review or papers written at the Command and General Staff College. I’ve read (and quoted) those in my last three books. What I mean is official publications like On Point (which was good) and On Point II (which wasn’t). That is, the studies that carry the imprint of a preface by a sponsoring three-star or four-star officer.
If not, why not? Is the Army really going to take the Lake Woebegone line that all its generals were above average? Or is just going to fold its arms and believe that such criticism is too rude for public discourse?
Speaking of generals, I still haven’t heard back from Lt. Gen. Huntoon about the nature of the misconduct the IG found him to have committed.
More from Foreign Policy


At Long Last, the Foreign Service Gets the Netflix Treatment
Keri Russell gets Drexel furniture but no Senate confirmation hearing.


How Macron Is Blocking EU Strategy on Russia and China
As a strategic consensus emerges in Europe, France is in the way.


What the Bush-Obama China Memos Reveal
Newly declassified documents contain important lessons for U.S. China policy.


Russia’s Boom Business Goes Bust
Moscow’s arms exports have fallen to levels not seen since the Soviet Union’s collapse.