Does anti-Ikhwanism really matter?
Mounting anti-Ikhwan sentiment inside and outside Egypt has become indisputable. The Muslim Brotherhood (MB) government’s poor performance coupled with its political arrogance and immaturity have irritated many Egyptians and alarmed western policymakers. However, the crucial question is: Does it really matter? Does the MB take their critics seriously? More importantly, how will this anti-Ikhwanism play ...
Mounting anti-Ikhwan sentiment inside and outside Egypt has become indisputable. The Muslim Brotherhood (MB) government's poor performance coupled with its political arrogance and immaturity have irritated many Egyptians and alarmed western policymakers. However, the crucial question is: Does it really matter? Does the MB take their critics seriously? More importantly, how will this anti-Ikhwanism play out with the internal politics of the MB?
Mounting anti-Ikhwan sentiment inside and outside Egypt has become indisputable. The Muslim Brotherhood (MB) government’s poor performance coupled with its political arrogance and immaturity have irritated many Egyptians and alarmed western policymakers. However, the crucial question is: Does it really matter? Does the MB take their critics seriously? More importantly, how will this anti-Ikhwanism play out with the internal politics of the MB?
The MB doesn’t seem to be much concerned with the growing resentment against its rule. The movement is chiefly preoccupied by grabbing as much power as it can and its leaders don’t give much attention to the allegation that their popularity is waning.
Moreover, President Mohamed Morsi tends to ignore, disdain, or threaten the opposition’s leaders, which he believes are attempting to undermine his rule. For him, as long as MB support is secure, nothing should be worrying. Not surprisingly, since taking power, Morsi has shown no sign of disentanglement between the presidency and the MB. His discourse and policy are still much attached to the MB’s ideology and leadership.
But why don’t Morsi and the MB seem to be concerned by the growing opposition to their rule, albeit publically? The answer in one word is: perception. Both perceive the opposition as a part of a global conspiracy against what they call "the Islamic project" or as Mahmoud Ghozlan, the spokesperson of the MB, puts it, "the opposition is an evil force [that] seeks to sabotage the revolution and exclude the MB." In other words, the MB leaders have tended to turn a blind eye on their mistakes and have hung their failure on the opposition’s shoulder. They suffer a sense of self-denial, which has become common among members who unashamedly tend to attribute Egypt’s problems to the opposition or to the "invisible and meddling fingers" that seek to destabilize their country, as Morsi repeatedly calls.
Nevertheless, the anti-Ikhwanism phenomenon, unlike many might think, has counterproductive effects on the MB. It significantly benefits the MB and plays in favor of its conservative leadership. In other words, the ongoing protests against the MB, inadvertently, do nothing but enhance the MB’s unity and solidify its leadership’s grip over the organization (tanzim). This happens through what I call the "ordeal" or mihna narrative. By this I refer to the sense of tribulation and victimization that prevails among the rank-and-file in the MB and enables them to confront or tolerate external pressure. This narrative historically originated from memories, emotions, and images of the MB’s malaise under different autocratic regimes from Gamal Abdel Nasser to Hosni Mubarak. It is incessantly constructed and reproduced by the MB leaders in order to maintain members’ solidarity and commitment to the MB’s ideology and leadership. Over time, the "mihna" narrative has become an integral component of the indoctrination and socialization process within the MB. It helped the MB to accommodate regimes’ repression and avoid any internal substantive fissures or schism over the past decades. Notions and terms like patience (sabr), God-test (ibtila), sacrifice (tadhiyya) are prevalent in the MB’s discourse and ideology.
More interestingly, members’ sufferance and tribulation has always been viewed as a key tool in the promotion process within the MB. The more members endure pressure, the higher they would get promoted within the movement’s structure. Not surprisingly, those leaders who were systematically arrested and tortured under Mubarak’s regime became the most influential leaders after the revolution, e.g. President Morsi, Khairat El-Shater, Hasan Malek, etc.
After the revolution, the MB’s leaders replaced Mubarak’s repression with the opposition’s conspiracy against their rule as a rallying point. It is one of many tactics that are employed by these leaders in order to maintain members’ loyalty and sustain the unity and coherence of the movement particularly during hard times or crises. Therefore, although they are in power, they continue to perceive themselves as "victims" of the opposition which turned to be the "external enemy" that attempts to undermine the "Islamic project" regardless of what the latter means. Ironically, the most powerful opposition to the MB’s rule now comes from Salafis and other Islamist forces not from liberal and secular forces. More importantly, by treating the opposition as an uncompromising "foe" the MB leadership could ensure members’ adherence and maintain their control over the organization. Indeed, the attacks on the MB’s headquarters in Mokattam in March was a golden chance for leadership to feed this narrative and internalize within members’ mindset. "Now the entire tanzim (organization) is under the control of the conservatives and all members would unwaveringly support President Morsi to the end of his tenure," a senior member of the MB told me. Clearly, the more the opposition presses the MB, the more solid and coherent the movement becomes.
In addition, MB leaders constantly invoke anti-Ikhwanism in order to bypass internal criticism and discredit calls for change and reform raised among the grassroots opposition. Over the past two years, particularly since the MB took power 10 months ago, no one could hold its leaders accountable or make them responsible for their decisions and mistakes. On the contrary, members have become increasingly willing to follow the "listen and obey" principle and succumb to the leadership. Not surprisingly, the reformist wing within the MB has eclipsed significantly. Reformist figures and youth were deliberately excluded, disenchanted, and marginalized by the hardliners who took over the movement over the past decade. Clearly, the MB tends to apply the same mechanism in dealing with secular and liberal opposition. Instead of promoting a genuine dialogue and listening to their demands, the MB has alienated the opposition’s figures and defamed them.
Ironically, while Egypt’s opposition is increasingly adopting an anti-Ikhwan discourse in order to expose and discredit the MB, the latter is emphatically banking on this discourse in order to maintain power and sustain its organizational coherence.
Khalil al-Anani is a Scholar of Middle East Politics at Durham University and has recently appointed as a Senior Fellow at the Middle East Institute (MEI) in Washington, D.C. His forthcoming book is, Unpacking the Muslim Brotherhood: Religion, Identity and Politics (tentative title). He can be reached at: email@example.com and followed on twitter @khalilalanani.
Khalil al-Anani is a Senior Fellow at Arab Center Washington DC and an associate professor of political science at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies. Twitter: @Khalilalanani
More from Foreign Policy
No, the World Is Not Multipolar
The idea of emerging power centers is popular but wrong—and could lead to serious policy mistakes.
America Prepares for a Pacific War With China It Doesn’t Want
Embedded with U.S. forces in the Pacific, I saw the dilemmas of deterrence firsthand.
America Can’t Stop China’s Rise
And it should stop trying.
The Morality of Ukraine’s War Is Very Murky
The ethical calculations are less clear than you might think.