Australian minister too drunk to debate
Drinking at work: it’s an ancient and venerable tradition, and one that enjoyed a great deal of popularity in the United States not too long ago. While the practice is still popular in continental Europe, American office culture has in recent decades largely succumbed to the influence of the teetotalers. Many have lamented this shift ...
Drinking at work: it's an ancient and venerable tradition, and one that enjoyed a great deal of popularity in the United States not too long ago. While the practice is still popular in continental Europe, American office culture has in recent decades largely succumbed to the influence of the teetotalers. Many have lamented this shift to sobriety, but another nation of Anglophones is demonstrating why it might not be such a bad idea.
Drinking at work: it’s an ancient and venerable tradition, and one that enjoyed a great deal of popularity in the United States not too long ago. While the practice is still popular in continental Europe, American office culture has in recent decades largely succumbed to the influence of the teetotalers. Many have lamented this shift to sobriety, but another nation of Anglophones is demonstrating why it might not be such a bad idea.
On Monday, the Finance Minister of the Australia’s New South Wales province, Greg Pearce, was asked to leave a parliamentary session for being too drunk to participate in debate. The Sydney Morning Herald reports:
Mr. Pearce was reportedly so inebriated during a marathon sitting of the upper house to debate changes to victims’ compensation laws, which concluded at about 4.30am on Thursday, [that] he had to be excused from Parliament.
Though Pearce has denied the charges, the Parliament is currently mulling proposals to institute a code of conduct governing responsible alcohol consumption.
The problem of drinking on the taxpayer dime is not limited to Australia. The Telegraph reported in March, after the arrest of a Tory MP for a drunken assault, that British MPs spent a total of £1.33 million in 2011 on alcohol in the nine different bars located in the House of Commons. Lest we think this is merely a problem for English-speakers, drunken ministers, presidents, and even colonels have appeared all over the world. Some highlights:
- March, 2013 — UN diplomats are reprimanded by US officials for being too drunk for budget negotiations.
- July, 2010 — A British MP admits he was "too drunk to vote" on Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne’s budget. (to be fair, the vote was taken at 2:07 a.m.)
- January, 2010 — A Belgian MP blames his slurred speech on dyslexia.
- February, 2009 — A visibly drunk Japanese finance minister is caught on tape at the G7
- January, 2002 — German troops trade beer for US military intelligence
- 1991-1999 — Boris Yeltsin’s entire career
The New South Wales Parliament has indicated that it will not move for a blanket ban of alcohol use while in session, but it is probably wise that they institute some restrictions rather than let the problem ferment. As for Pearce, he maintains that he was merely sleepy.
More from Foreign Policy
No, the World Is Not Multipolar
The idea of emerging power centers is popular but wrong—and could lead to serious policy mistakes.
America Prepares for a Pacific War With China It Doesn’t Want
Embedded with U.S. forces in the Pacific, I saw the dilemmas of deterrence firsthand.
America Can’t Stop China’s Rise
And it should stop trying.
The Morality of Ukraine’s War Is Very Murky
The ethical calculations are less clear than you might think.
Sign up for World Brief
FP’s flagship evening newsletter guiding you through the most important world stories of the day. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.