The Army’s $900 toilet seat?; Where’s the love for Dempsey and Winnefeld?; A really awkward NSA leak; A behind-the-scenes look at Ya’alon’s Osprey ride; and a bit more.
By Gordon Lubold The Pentagon’s "new $900 toilet seat?" TNR is all over the Army’s DCGS-A intel system. Investigative reporter Robert Draper is out with a piece in The New Republic today about the controversial Army intel system that has been mired in cost overruns, delays and dramatic differences of opinion in an ongoing controversy ...
By Gordon Lubold
The Pentagon's "new $900 toilet seat?" TNR is all over the Army's DCGS-A intel system. Investigative reporter Robert Draper is out with a piece in The New Republic today about the controversial Army intel system that has been mired in cost overruns, delays and dramatic differences of opinion in an ongoing controversy for years. But a heated exchange between Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno and Republican Rep. Duncan Hunter of California during a public hearing this spring put the Distributed Common Ground System's problems back on the political map. Draper's piece, published on TNR's iPad app today, exposes the Army's inconsistencies about the multi-billion dollar program and lays out a chronology about how the service has been rolling out the system. The story includes lots of criticism of the system among Army types and others, as well as the perspective from a number of defenders, including Lt. Gen. Mary Legere, deputy chief of staff, G-2, pictured in the story with the caption: "The Lead Blocker."
Draper's piece also goes into the technology available by Palantir, the Palo-Alto-based company that has provided that technology to the CIA, Special Ops and others that other top intelligence officials. The Palantir system is thought to be effective by many, even if it couldn't in its current form replace DCGS-A. But the Army seems wedded to it's own system, one that could cost upwards of $28 billion over its lifespan, Draper says.
By Gordon Lubold
The Pentagon’s "new $900 toilet seat?" TNR is all over the Army’s DCGS-A intel system. Investigative reporter Robert Draper is out with a piece in The New Republic today about the controversial Army intel system that has been mired in cost overruns, delays and dramatic differences of opinion in an ongoing controversy for years. But a heated exchange between Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno and Republican Rep. Duncan Hunter of California during a public hearing this spring put the Distributed Common Ground System’s problems back on the political map. Draper’s piece, published on TNR’s iPad app today, exposes the Army’s inconsistencies about the multi-billion dollar program and lays out a chronology about how the service has been rolling out the system. The story includes lots of criticism of the system among Army types and others, as well as the perspective from a number of defenders, including Lt. Gen. Mary Legere, deputy chief of staff, G-2, pictured in the story with the caption: "The Lead Blocker."
Draper’s piece also goes into the technology available by Palantir, the Palo-Alto-based company that has provided that technology to the CIA, Special Ops and others that other top intelligence officials. The Palantir system is thought to be effective by many, even if it couldn’t in its current form replace DCGS-A. But the Army seems wedded to it’s own system, one that could cost upwards of $28 billion over its lifespan, Draper says.
There have been many ups and downs. The Army, one Democratic staffer told Draper, has often said that it is close to rolling the system out, only to say six months later that the system is delayed once again. "They get into super acronym mode and it becomes kind of a confusing game," the staffer told Draper, according to the iPad version of the story. Draper spoke with one House staffer who refers to the DCGS-A system as the "new nine-hundred dollar toilet seat."
Draper, appearing on Fox News this weekend, said DCGS-A, in the works since the 1990s, was supposed to be a "remedy" to give soldiers in the field access to the intelligence that always existed – but wasn’t always accessible – from where insurgents and roadside bombs are to the history of an area of responsibility. Draper: "Well the sources in the Army say that DCGS, as it’s known, doesn’t work, or doesn’t work well, and that the whole point of it is for this information to be accessible, so that you can pull it up right away and use it. And that doesn’t happen with DCGS for a variety of reasons. It’s been developed by, for lack of a better way of putting it, the military-industrial complex…by a series of big military contractors working in conjunction with engineers in the Army intelligence office. And the problem is iteration after iteration has come in late and has come in by the time it’s out basically it’s already obsolete."
Click bait: Heated exchange vid between Odierno and Hunter, here.
Welcome to Monday’s edition of Situation Report. Sign up for Situation Report here or just e-mail us. And as always, if you have a report, piece of news, or a tidbit you want teased, send it to us early for maximum tease. Please follow us @glubold. And remember, if you see something, say something — to Situation Report.
Obama meets with G-8 leaders starting today in Europe, where for many there, the bloom is off the rose over Syria and other issues. The WaPo’s Scott Wilson: "As he arrives Monday in Northern Ireland for his first trip to Europe in two years, Obama will be confronting the diplomatic fallout from his actions and inaction on some of the most urgent concerns of his European counterparts. His long delay in more aggressively supporting Syria’s beleaguered opposition forces – a move that his administration announced in the form of expanded military aid on the eve of his visit here – has frustrated the leaders of France and Germany. The recent disclosure of the National Security Agency’s telephone and Internet surveillance has angered many European politicians, particularly German Chancellor Angela Merkel, whom he will see on both stops of his three-day visit." Full story, here.
McDonough defended the NSA surveillance program. White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough said the administration’s surveillance programs do not violate privacy laws on CBS’ Face the Nation and that there would be more on this in the days to come from President Barack Obama, who has said he welcomes a public debate on the issue.
Schieffer: "Are you saying to me this morning that the government’s done nothing wrong here?"
McDonough: "You know what? I’m not saying that. I’m saying that if there are problems, we’re going to get to the bottom of them, as we on any number of these other issues. But we’re also recognize that — the president recognizes more than anybody — that he has a fundamental obligation to the American people, and that’s to keep them safe, but he also swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. He believes that we can do both. He believes that we are doing both. And he’s proud of the work that we’ve been able to undertake to do that." Full transcript, here.
Awkward! A new trove of secret documents from Edward Snowden include one that shows that American and British intelligence agencies eavesdropped on world leaders at conferences in London in 2009… some of the very ones at the big G-8 meeting in Northern Ireland today. The NYT writes this morning: "The latest disclosures, appearing again in The Guardian, came the night before a meeting of the Group of 8 industrialized nations was to open in Northern Ireland, where some of the leaders who were intelligence targets four years ago will be in attendance."
Why haven’t Dempsey and Winnefeld been re-upped? Gen. Marty Dempsey and Adm. Sandy Winnefeld, chairman and vice-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are near the end of their first, two-year terms but have yet to be re-nominated. Typically, the White House would have re-nominated each position by about this time in the chairman’s and vice’s term. Adm. Mike Mullen, for example, was re-nominated in March of 2009 for his second term, and the Senate acted on the nomination by September. Dempsey was sworn in in October 2011, which means his two-year term expires this fall. But not to worry, a senior defense official tells Situation Report. The noms are coming "very soon," we’re told by e-mail this morning. "Both are well respected at the White House."
The Behind-the-Music on Israeli MOD’s Osprey ride. Israeli Minister of Defense Moshe Ya’alon visited the Pentagon Friday and got his first ride in the Marines’ MV-22 Osprey. The Israelis are in the process of buying Ospreys from the U.S. and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel’s office made a little video of the demonstration with a cameo from Derek Chollet, Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs, still shots of the ride and a little audio for color.
With a cameo from Osprey pilot Maj. Justin Marvel (we wish he w
as still a captain) "…If it was told to go back into combat again, I’d take a V-22 every day of the week and twice on Sunday."
A Marine running the demo, to Ya’alon and the rest of the delegation: "…if anyone feels like they’re getting sick, stick your hand out and I’ll bring you a bag." Watch the video here.
Lockheed Martin: Never hurts to remind folks about the F-35C: "Fifth generation matters." A full page ad by Lockheed Martin on page A20 of the WaPo today.
Is this change Obama can believe in? Writing on FP, Vali Nasr, on the election in Iran, which gave a surprise victory to a reformist, Hasan Rowhani. This could open up the possibility of a nuclear deal, but the U.S. has to step up. Nasr: "This is all good news for Iranian politics, but what matters most to the West these days is the fate of the country’s nuclear program. There is cautious optimism that popular support for moderation at the polls will translate into concessions at the negotiating table. Rowhani sent clear signals during the presidential campaign that if elected he would seek to end Iran’s international isolation. Favoring engagement over resistance, he said, "We have no other option than moderation." That may well be the case, but a nuclear deal is still far from certain, and in fact this June surprise could confound U.S. strategy in dealing with Iran."
Emmett Beliveau takes over for George Mulligan as director of the White House’s Military Office. Borrowing from Politico’s Mike Allen’s exclusive yesterday in Playbook: George Mulligan ended 20 years at the WH Military Office last week, the last few years as its director, and is now succeeded by Emmett Beliveau. The WHMO provides military support to the WH in the form of Air Force One, Marine One, Camp David and others. According to Allen, Beliveau "has been at the White House since the first day of the Obama Administration, serving as Director of Advance and Operations, and then as Director of the Chief of Staff’s Office for both Bill Daley and Jack Lew. Beliveau is respected across the Administration and has worked closely with WHMO on initiatives ranging from planning international summits to Obama’s secret trips to Afghanistan and Iraq." Mulligan will come to the Pentagon after a break, but Situation Report is told just where is still "TBD."
Chuck Hagel, on Mulligan, Beliveau: "For nearly twenty years, George Mulligan has provided outstanding support to three Commanders-in-Chief serving in the White House Military Office. As Director of that office, George has provided an essential link between the White House and the Department of Defense. He is a terrific leader. I look forward to welcoming him back to the Department of Defense and his continued service to the nation. I am also looking forward to working with Emmett Beliveau as the new Director of the White House Military Office. Emmett has already done outstanding work in a number of complex roles at the White House and has deep experience working with the U.S. military. I am confident he will help ensure that the men and women of the Department of Defense meet the highest standards in the many roles in which they support the Commander in Chief."
- BBC: Iran vote: Rowhani vows transparency on nuclear issue.
- AP: New Iranian president urges "path to moderation" but won’t stop uranium enrichment.
- Talking Points Memo: Top West Point official "misused position to obtain cat care."
- AP: British PM: Russia must push for talks with Syria.
- Defense News: Italian DM: Will Syria conflict create regional conflict?
Gordon Lubold is a national security reporter for Foreign Policy. He is also the author of FP's Situation Report, an e-mailed newsletter that is blasted out to more than 70,000 national security and foreign affairs subscribers each morning that includes the top nat-sec news, breaking news, tidbits, nuggets and what he likes to call "candy." Before arriving at FP, he was a senior advisor at the United States Institute of Peace in Washington, where he wrote on national security and foreign policy. Prior to his arrival at USIP, he was a defense reporter for Politico, where he launched the popular Morning Defense early morning blog and tip-sheet. Prior to that, he was the Pentagon and national security correspondent for the Christian Science Monitor, and before that he was the Pentagon correspondent for the Army Times chain of newspapers. He has covered conflict in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and other countries in South Asia, and has reported on military matters in sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia and Latin America as well as at American military bases across the country. He has spoken frequently on the sometimes-contentious relationship between the military and the media as a guest on numerous panels. He also appears on radio and television, including on CNN, public radio's Diane Rehm and To the Point, and C-SPAN's Washington Journal. He lives in Alexandria with his wife and two children. Twitter: @glubold
More from Foreign Policy
China and the Taliban Begin Their Romance
Beijing has its eyes set on using Afghanistan as a strategic corridor once U.S. troops are out of the way.
The Taliban Are Breaking Bad
Meth is even more profitable than heroin—and is turbocharging the insurgency.
Belarus’s Unlikely New Leader
Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya didn’t set out to challenge a brutal dictatorship.
What the Taliban Takeover Means for India
Kabul’s swift collapse leaves New Delhi with significant security concerns.