Gellman vs. Lewis on leaks vs. security
By Tsion Hiletework Best Defense guest reporter What was most striking about a discussion of government surveillance programs at CSIS on Tuesday was the width of the gap between cyber-experts focusing on national security and journalists focusing on constitutional rights. Bart Gellman of the Washington Post called for more media scrutiny of the “so-called spy ...
By Tsion Hiletework
Best Defense guest reporter
What was most striking about a discussion of government surveillance programs at CSIS on Tuesday was the width of the gap between cyber-experts focusing on national security and journalists focusing on constitutional rights.
By Tsion Hiletework
Best Defense guest reporter
What was most striking about a discussion of government surveillance programs at CSIS on Tuesday was the width of the gap between cyber-experts focusing on national security and journalists focusing on constitutional rights.
Bart Gellman of the Washington Post called for more media scrutiny of the “so-called spy programs.” James Lewis, a CSIS cybersecurity expert, responded, rather dismissively, “There aren’t enough people in analysis to make investigating your private sex life priority number one.”
On the other hand, Lewis recognized the need for more transparency, while Gellman conceded that publicly admitting to PRISM is difficult for the government because its contents often contain private databases and warrant-based information.
What to take away? Well, even with the questionable intent and conduct of what Lewis called the “NSA’s free backup service,” Gellman also noted that the program has been treated as constitutional by the three branches of the federal government. In other words, the line between terrorism protection and individual intrusion remains hazy.
Gellman and Lewis may have contrasting opinions, but despite their differing points of origin, they sat down at the table to talk directly. Whether the government will be as direct in discussing its clandestine programs seems unlikely.
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
