The Royal Navy now has 15 times as many commanders as it has warships
So reports a British MP. The senior service now has 40 admirals, 260 captains — but just 19 ships, he alleges. But checking around the web, I think what the MP meant was that Britannia has just 19 major surface combatants (not counting minesweepers and such). It also has about a dozen submarines — but ...
So reports a British MP. The senior service now has 40 admirals, 260 captains -- but just 19 ships, he alleges. But checking around the web, I think what the MP meant was that Britannia has just 19 major surface combatants (not counting minesweepers and such). It also has about a dozen submarines -- but then, the British have always undervalued subs, haven't they?
At any rate, the MP's point is a good one. It appears that the RN could man an entire warship with surplus skippers. On the other hand, here's one blog's analysis that kind of knocks down the report. The blogger needs an editor -- he leads with ancillary observations, and only after much throat-clearing gets to his argument. But worth wading through the top to get to the core argument.
The newspaper report adds that the British Army has more generals (260) than it has main battle tanks (200). I wonder if it has more artillery officers than artillery pieces. Anyone know?
So reports a British MP. The senior service now has 40 admirals, 260 captains — but just 19 ships, he alleges. But checking around the web, I think what the MP meant was that Britannia has just 19 major surface combatants (not counting minesweepers and such). It also has about a dozen submarines — but then, the British have always undervalued subs, haven’t they?
At any rate, the MP’s point is a good one. It appears that the RN could man an entire warship with surplus skippers. On the other hand, here’s one blog’s analysis that kind of knocks down the report. The blogger needs an editor — he leads with ancillary observations, and only after much throat-clearing gets to his argument. But worth wading through the top to get to the core argument.
The newspaper report adds that the British Army has more generals (260) than it has main battle tanks (200). I wonder if it has more artillery officers than artillery pieces. Anyone know?
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
