Army boots Camp Zama commander
He was bounced on the usual charge of “lack of confidence.” Army declines further comment, citing privacy concerns. I wonder whether such concerns are legitimate. After all, these are public positions, funded by the taxpayer. If a senior government official is removed, isn’t the public entitled to know the reason why? Also, I wish that ...
He was bounced on the usual charge of "lack of confidence." Army declines further comment, citing privacy concerns. I wonder whether such concerns are legitimate. After all, these are public positions, funded by the taxpayer. If a senior government official is removed, isn't the public entitled to know the reason why?
He was bounced on the usual charge of “lack of confidence.” Army declines further comment, citing privacy concerns. I wonder whether such concerns are legitimate. After all, these are public positions, funded by the taxpayer. If a senior government official is removed, isn’t the public entitled to know the reason why?
Also, I wish that Army public affairs officers would stop thinking it is cute to release bad news late on Fridays. It is not.
More from Foreign Policy
A New Multilateralism
How the United States can rejuvenate the global institutions it created.
America Prepares for a Pacific War With China It Doesn’t Want
Embedded with U.S. forces in the Pacific, I saw the dilemmas of deterrence firsthand.
The Endless Frustration of Chinese Diplomacy
Beijing’s representatives are always scared they could be the next to vanish.
The End of America’s Middle East
The region’s four major countries have all forfeited Washington’s trust.
Sign up for World Brief
FP’s flagship evening newsletter guiding you through the most important world stories of the day. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.