Bonenberger’s ‘Afghan Post’: An unusual and interesting memoir of the Afghan war
I recently read an advance copy of Adrian Bonenberger’s Afghan Post, which is scheduled to be published in January. It is worth reading. He takes about 50 pages to get up a head of steam, but he is a skilled writer, with an interesting story to tell as he goes from being a weenie English ...
I recently read an advance copy of Adrian Bonenberger's Afghan Post, which is scheduled to be published in January. It is worth reading. He takes about 50 pages to get up a head of steam, but he is a skilled writer, with an interesting story to tell as he goes from being a weenie English major at Yale (yeah, I was too, but I didn't sit in the Elizabethan Club browsing old issues of Punch, and I never affected the British phraseology that pimples the younger Bonenberger's prose in the first part of this book).
I recently read an advance copy of Adrian Bonenberger’s Afghan Post, which is scheduled to be published in January. It is worth reading. He takes about 50 pages to get up a head of steam, but he is a skilled writer, with an interesting story to tell as he goes from being a weenie English major at Yale (yeah, I was too, but I didn’t sit in the Elizabethan Club browsing old issues of Punch, and I never affected the British phraseology that pimples the younger Bonenberger’s prose in the first part of this book).
The real theme of the book, I think, is that Bonenberger was more comfortable, more real, in the Army, even in Ranger school, than he was at Yale. Being an Airborne Ranger meant a lot to him. (“Feels like New Haven — or, the way New Haven should’ve been — with something more substantial beneath it all.”)
Yet ultimately he decided to leave the Army. He’s not a “good soldier,” in the occasionally pejorative sense of that word. He is thoughtful, observant, skeptical: “No matter how much the Generals, Colonels and Lieutenant-Colonels would like the soldiers to believe it’s the civilians’ or politicians’ fault for not supporting the military better, if the buck stops somewhere it should stop with them.”
He’s also bothered by how much black Special Operations, he calls “a professional cadre of assassins,” have become the cultural heart of the U.S. military. He worries, as Andrew Bacevich does, that we have set up a perpetual machine in the belief that “without these assassins, we wouldn’t be safe, that the only way to deal with the bad terrorist men was to keep murdering them. Not until they go away, because they’ll never ‘go away.'”
The scariest line in the book comes near the end: “That was my job, after all, to believe in the mission, to keep it going even when common sense and experience was giving me other information.” I am not sure I agree with that job definition. What can a captain do? He can tell the truth to his chain of command.
His political conclusion, written in 2008 in Afghanistan: “What our Republic needs is less empire, and more responsible citizenry.” Hard to argue with that.
More from Foreign Policy
Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?
The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.
Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World
It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.
It’s a New Great Game. Again.
Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.
Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.
Sign up for World Brief
FP’s flagship evening newsletter guiding you through the most important world stories of the day. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
