Putin Backs Sisi’s Bid for Egypt’s Presidency
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday conveyed his support for Egyptian Field Marshal Abdel Fattah al-Sisi’s bid for Egypt’s presidency, wishing him "luck" in the upcoming contest. Meeting with Egyptian authorities in Moscow, Putin told Sisi, "I know that you have decided to run for president of Egypt. This is a very responsible decision, to ...
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday conveyed his support for Egyptian Field Marshal Abdel Fattah al-Sisi’s bid for Egypt’s presidency, wishing him "luck" in the upcoming contest. Meeting with Egyptian authorities in Moscow, Putin told Sisi, "I know that you have decided to run for president of Egypt. This is a very responsible decision, to take upon yourself responsibility for the fate of the Egyptian people." Though Sisi has not officially announced his candidacy for the presidency, his visit to Moscow is another sign that such announcement is imminent. Sisi’s meeting with Russian officials aimed at finalizing a $2 billion arms agreement between Egypt and Russia. "Our visit offers a new start to the development of military and technological co-operation between Egypt and Russia. We hope to speed up this co-operation," Sisi remarked on the meeting.
The Syrian National Coalition on Wednesday presented a 24-point plan consisting of "basic principles" to end the Syrian conflict. Surprisingly, the document makes no mention of Assad, and includes plans for the formation of a transitional authority and the eviction of all foreign fighters from Syria. The Syrian government delegation at Geneva has not yet responded to the proposal. In Homs, the humanitarian ceasefire has been extended for three more days to allow for the evacuation of remaining civilians. The city’s governor, Talal al-Barazi, claims that 1,400 people have been evacuated from Homs since last Friday, but nearly 220 of those rescued are facing background checks by Syrian authorities. Meanwhile, fighting between Syrian government and opposition forces persists across the country. On Wednesday, Syrian government forces conducted airstrikes in Aleppo, killing at least 51 people, and resumed military operations against Yabroud, the last remaining rebel stronghold in the Qalamoun mountains. Fighting in the Qalamoun area has forced many local Syrians to flee their homes for neighboring Lebanon. According to the British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, 236 people on average have been killed daily since the beginning of the Geneva 2 peace talks in late January.
- Fighting between Iraqi authorities and Sunni militants in Iraq’s Anbar province has displaced up to 300,000 people since late December according to the UN.
- Islamist militants seized part of the northern Iraqi town of Sulaiman Bek and surrounding villages on Thursday, marking the Iraqi government’s latest loss of territory to militants.
- Israel is proceeding with plans to construct a nine-story Jewish seminary in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of Arab East Jerusalem.
Arguments and Analysis
‘Worse Than Mubarak: Egypt’s New Constitution and the Police State‘ (Mara Revkin, Foreign Affairs)
"Egypt is not the first country in the world to declare a ‘war on terror,’ but it is one of the only nations to have written counterterrorism into its constitution. Last month, an overwhelming 98.1 percent of voters approved Egypt’s new charter in a referendum marred by a heavy-handed military campaign to stifle dissent. The new constitution further marginalizes Islamists from political life and enhances the powers of the military and security services by, among other things, banning all political activity based on religion and giving the military veto authority over the president’s choice of defense minister for the next eight years. But as problematic as those measures are, one of the constitution’s most alarming sections has been overlooked: an unprecedented counterterrorism clause that lays the legal foundation for a police state that is a military dictatorship in all but name.
Buried on page 62 of a rambling document that most Egyptians admit they have not even read is Article 237, the most sweeping counterterrorism mandate in any Egyptian constitution. It obligates the state to ‘fight all types and forms of terrorism and track its sources of funding within a specific time frame in recognition of the threat it represents to the nation and citizens.’ Article 237 doesn’t define ‘terrorism’ or the scope of the powers it grants the government, deferring them to future legislation. But for now, Egypt has no parliament. The military dissolved it last summer as part of its overthrow of former President Mohammed Morsi. With new parliamentary elections not expected until later this year, legislative authority rests solely in the hands of the military-appointed interim president, Adly Mansour."
‘The Tunisian Constitution: The Process and the Outcome‘ (Mohamed-Salah Omri, Jadaliyya)
"The Tunisian constitution is the outcome of a process of a struggle over what the post-revolution society is going to be like. The deadlock did not lead to open conflict, but instead, to negotiation and tradeoffs. The development of the constitution over the last three years is organically linked to the dynamics in the country over the same period. Its final version bears the traces of mutual distrust among the two main political poles. And just like any compromise, it opens room for interpretation. One thing is certain: the turn towards a religious state in Tunisia has been aborted. Now begins the work to consolidate and enshrine into laws the foundations of a democratic, civil, and just state. For this reason, the next elections are absolutely crucial to the future of Tunisia, to the role of political Islam, and to the region as a whole.
On a more prospective level, this process is ingenious. I am not sure how it came about or whether it had a precedent elsewhere. But it is certainly worth studying, and perhaps even emulating in similar situations, since it has been the determining factor in bringing about a decisive turn to democratic and civil rule in Tunisia. One further issue is worth bearing in mind. The national dialogue in Tunisia resulted in three simultaneous outcomes: an independent government whose members are not allowed to run for office in the next elections, a consensual constitution, and an independent election commission. All three have been designed to remove political parties from government until next elections. This has evened out the playing field and changed the rules of the game for the next elections. Ennahda is no longer driving the agenda, and its opponents can no longer continue capitalizing on opposing its policies. The outcome of this unprecedented situation is anyone’s guess."
‘No Stability in Syria Without Political Change‘ (Thomas Pierret, Carnegie Endowment)
"Many point to regional influence over the actors on both sides of the conflict as a reason for this blockage and, consequently, as the key to ending the deadlock. If Iran, which supports Assad, and Saudi Arabia, which supports the opposition, could be drawn into direct talks over Syria, so the argument goes, these regional powers might be able to balance their interests among themselves. They could then agree to symmetrically scale down their support to the warring sides, thereby dampening the conflict and creating the conditions for a settlement in Syria.
But the role of regional state players in the exacerbation of the conflict should not be exaggerated. Neither Iran nor Saudi Arabia is primarily responsible for the conflict’s sectarian turn. Rather, they have been dragged into a sectarian conflictthat long predates their rivalry. The conflict’s transformation into an all-out war — which dates to early February 2012, when the regime began using heavy artillery against Homs — occurred before there had been any significant Saudi involvement on the rebel side, although Iran was already funding and supporting Assad’s government at that time.
The Syrian conflict is first and foremost about sectarian power sharing inside Syria. It cannot be solved while Assad and his fellow members of a small religious minority, the Alawites, exert total control over the military-security apparatus. For as long as this fundamental internal imbalance remains, Syria will remain a black hole irresistibly attracting external players — and attempts to resolve the conflict by focusing only on its regional dimension will be doomed to fail. Any credible peace effort requires negotiations that deal with the root problem and the demand for real political transition."
— Joshua Haber
More from Foreign Policy
America Is a Heartbeat Away From a War It Could Lose
Global war is neither a theoretical contingency nor the fever dream of hawks and militarists.
The West’s Incoherent Critique of Israel’s Gaza Strategy
The reality of fighting Hamas in Gaza makes this war terrible one way or another.
Biden Owns the Israel-Palestine Conflict Now
In tying Washington to Israel’s war in Gaza, the U.S. president now shares responsibility for the broader conflict’s fate.
Taiwan’s Room to Maneuver Shrinks as Biden and Xi Meet
As the latest crisis in the straits wraps up, Taipei is on the back foot.