More pathological beliefs about the Ukraine crisis: Putin the master player
By Christopher J. Fettweis Best Defense guest columnist 3) Putin is a master strategist. He plays chess while we play checkers. One of the most popular metaphors to explain the U.S. reaction to the crisis has been to suggest that while Putin plays chess, President Obama plays checkers. Putin is strategic and clever, in other words, while ...
By Christopher J. Fettweis
Best Defense guest columnist
3) Putin is a master strategist. He plays chess while we play checkers.
One of the most popular metaphors to explain the U.S. reaction to the crisis has been to suggest that while Putin plays chess, President Obama plays checkers. Putin is strategic and clever, in other words, while Obama is simple and one-dimensional. The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee believes checkers gives Obama too much credit; the president is actually only playing marbles.
As political scientist Robert Jervis observed some time ago, for a variety of reasons all "actors tend to see the behavior of others as more centralized, disciplined, and coordinated than it is." In part because they are far more aware of their own internal deliberations and only see the outcomes of those elsewhere, people tend to believe that the other is unified, strategic, and purposeful. As a result, it appears to some that every enemy the United States has ever faced has played chess while Washington merely played checkers. It is never true.
By Christopher J. Fettweis
Best Defense guest columnist
3) Putin is a master strategist. He plays chess while we play checkers.
One of the most popular metaphors to explain the U.S. reaction to the crisis has been to suggest that while Putin plays chess, President Obama plays checkers. Putin is strategic and clever, in other words, while Obama is simple and one-dimensional. The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee believes checkers gives Obama too much credit; the president is actually only playing marbles.
As political scientist Robert Jervis observed some time ago, for a variety of reasons all "actors tend to see the behavior of others as more centralized, disciplined, and coordinated than it is." In part because they are far more aware of their own internal deliberations and only see the outcomes of those elsewhere, people tend to believe that the other is unified, strategic, and purposeful. As a result, it appears to some that every enemy the United States has ever faced has played chess while Washington merely played checkers. It is never true.
(Still more to come.)
Christopher J. Fettweis is associate professor of political science at Tulane University in New Orleans. The thoughts in this essay are extensions of his latest book, The Pathologies of Power: Fear, Honor, Glory and Hubris in U.S. Foreign Policy.
More from Foreign Policy

Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.

So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.

Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.

Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.