Washington’s dealings with militias: Had to rely on them, but still didn’t like them
There’s a good, if rambling, essay on George Washington and irregular forces in the July issue of the Journal of Military History. The article, by John Hall of the University of Wisconsin, is also a good guide to the modern historiography of Washington. The key point of the article, I think, is that Washington didn’t ...
There's a good, if rambling, essay on George Washington and irregular forces in the July issue of the Journal of Military History. The article, by John Hall of the University of Wisconsin, is also a good guide to the modern historiography of Washington.
There’s a good, if rambling, essay on George Washington and irregular forces in the July issue of the Journal of Military History. The article, by John Hall of the University of Wisconsin, is also a good guide to the modern historiography of Washington.
The key point of the article, I think, is that Washington didn’t like militias, but also found himself dependent on them in both the French and Indian War and the Revolution.
The article also made me think that the effectiveness of American militias during the Revolution is probably best understood in the geographical context of how far they were from home. My bet is the closer they were to their homes, the better they were at reconnaissance, raiding and even close-in fighting. Anyone know of someone who has looked at this?
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.