Farragut and Du Pont: One Civil War admiral succeeded by taking risks, while the other failed by being afraid to do so
I promised the other day to do a separate item on the article in the Oct. 2014 issue of Journal of Military History about how Admiral David Farragut succeeded by taking risks, while Admiral Samuel Du Pont failed by avoiding risks. The author, James McPherson, concludes that Du Pont’s "tragic flaw, like that of McClellan, ...
I promised the other day to do a separate item on the article in the Oct. 2014 issue of Journal of Military History about how Admiral David Farragut succeeded by taking risks, while Admiral Samuel Du Pont failed by avoiding risks.
I promised the other day to do a separate item on the article in the Oct. 2014 issue of Journal of Military History about how Admiral David Farragut succeeded by taking risks, while Admiral Samuel Du Pont failed by avoiding risks.
The author, James McPherson, concludes that Du Pont’s "tragic flaw, like that of McClellan, was his unwillingness to take large risks, and then to refuse to take responsibility for the failures that stemmed from unwillingness." On the other hand, he concludes, Farragut resembled Grant: "they were willing to take great risks."
This guy McPherson has a lot of promise. I wonder what else he might have written.
Also, I wanna note that everyone mentioned in this item has a traffic circle or square with his name on it in Washington, D.C., except poor old Grant. Even McPherson.
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.