Do Iraq and Syria no longer exist, and if so? (5): Yes — and that’s a big reason why their militaries simply won’t be effective
Paul Eaton, a retired Army major general who oversaw the training the Iraqi military from 2003 to 2004: "Creating a soldier from an 18-year-old civilian is easy in most Western nations. We make them physically tough, give them the military skill sets necessary to prosecute the mission, and amplify what my British colleagues call the ...
Paul Eaton, a retired Army major general who oversaw the training the Iraqi military from 2003 to 2004:
Paul Eaton, a retired Army major general who oversaw the training the Iraqi military from 2003 to 2004:
"Creating a soldier from an 18-year-old civilian is easy in most Western nations. We make them physically tough, give them the military skill sets necessary to prosecute the mission, and amplify what my British colleagues call the moral component. This final part of the soldierization phase is essentially a trust in national institutions and a belief in the chain of command from squad leader to the commander-in-chief. For a Westerner, the moral component is built over the new soldier’s lifetime and is strengthened in uniform.
For countries without a strong democratic tradition, establishing the moral component is a real challenge and particularly so for me and my team as we rebuilt the Iraqi Army in 2003. Fifteen hundred years of the paternalism of Islam and over three decades of Saddam’s despotism are hard to overcome.
During a visit with the Jordanian Army in 2003, I noticed a general wearing a pin — the Jordanian flag with the numeral one superposed. He explained that it did not mean we’re number one, but per the king’s request, was worn to state "Jordan first." Jordan above family, imam, religion, ethnicity, tribe, sheikh — and anything else that would compete with loyalty to the state.
King Abdullah, a graduate of Great Britain’s Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, clearly understands the importance of the moral component in the creation of a soldier who believes he is a legitimate actor, acting on behalf of a legitimate government.
It took Great Britain almost three centuries of work in India to develop all the institutions necessary for a modern, though immensely complex state, to function effectively politically, economically and militarily.
The Sykes-Picot Agreement that helped set the stage for our current ISIS dilemma in Iraq and Syria is less than a century old, with no provision for a midwife to accomplish in Iraq and Syria what took a most competent British administration to achieve in India. With sectarian pressures pulling Iraq and Syria apart, frustrating efforts at legitimacy development, the Iraqi soldier and his Syrian counterpart will find their own sense of legitimacy as elusive as the viability of their states."
More from Foreign Policy
Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.
The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.
Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.
How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
