The Cable

The Cable goes inside the foreign policy machine, from Foggy Bottom to Turtle Bay, the White House to Embassy Row.

Senate Committee Won’t Let U.S. Troops Fight the Islamic State

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted on Thursday to authorize military force against the Islamic State for three years but prohibited American troops from combat. The measure passed on a party-line vote, 10-8. The 10 Democrats who voted for the bill, reluctant to grant any Authority to Use Military Force that could lead to American ...

460200522
460200522

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted on Thursday to authorize military force against the Islamic State for three years but prohibited American troops from combat.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted on Thursday to authorize military force against the Islamic State for three years but prohibited American troops from combat.

The measure passed on a party-line vote, 10-8. The 10 Democrats who voted for the bill, reluctant to grant any Authority to Use Military Force that could lead to American troops engaging in combat in the Middle East, exposed a clear split with President Barack Obama. Earlier this week, Secretary of State John Kerry told the committee that although the White House doesn’t plan on sending ground troops to Iraq and Syria, lawmakers shouldn’t limit Obama and the Pentagon’s options.

All but one Republican opposed the measure because it would limit options for using troops. In contrast, Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.) thinks it wouldn’t limit Obama and the Defense Department enough.

The authorization would allow the president to target “associated forces” of the self-proclaimed Islamic State, allowing the Pentagon to go after pro-Islamic State forces outside of Iraq and Syria. The White House specifically asked for this authority.

Lawmakers acknowledged that the full Senate would not have time to consider the authorization, meant to supersede the 2001 authorization against al Qaeda, before the holidays. When Republicans take control of Congress in January, Obama can again try to win a more open authorization.

Photo Credit: Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call Group

More from Foreign Policy

Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.
Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America

The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.
Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense

If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War

Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.
An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests

And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.