The Cable

The Cable goes inside the foreign policy machine, from Foggy Bottom to Turtle Bay, the White House to Embassy Row.

Special Ops Staying Put in the Horn – For Now

No Pullout, Spokesmen Say, Despite General's Comments

Hardline Islamist fighters from Al-Shaba
Hardline Islamist fighters from Al-Shaba
Hardline Islamist fighters from Al-Shabab chant slogans as they rally in the streets of Mogadishu on October 30, 2009 to show their support for Palestinian people and denounce the October 25, 2009 Israeli police storming of the Al-Aqsa mosque compound in Jerusalem. AFP PHOTO/MOHAMED DAHIR (Photo credit should read MOHAMED DAHIR/AFP/Getty Images)

The United States’ top special operations officer raised eyebrows Jan. 27 when he suggested that America might replace its special operations forces in the Horn of Africa, a hotbed of Islamist fighters, with conventional troops -- a major shift that could make it harder for the United States to track and kill some of its most dangerous adversaries.

The United States’ top special operations officer raised eyebrows Jan. 27 when he suggested that America might replace its special operations forces in the Horn of Africa, a hotbed of Islamist fighters, with conventional troops — a major shift that could make it harder for the United States to track and kill some of its most dangerous adversaries.

At issues are the elite troops, including Navy SEALs and operators from the Army’s Delta Force, who have spent years in the Horn fighting al Qaeda’s East Africa cell and al-Shabab, the Islamist militant group that controls large swaths of Somalia. They have conducted missions ranging from installing signals intelligence gear in Mogadishu, positioning high-tech cameras along the Somali shoreline, and launching direct action raids against leading Islamist commanders, such as the September 14, 2009 helicopter attack that killed Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan, an al Qaeda leader in East Africa.

Joint Special Operations Command, which controls the most elite special ops units, also keeps a force in Djibouti ready for missions across the Bab-el-Mandeb strait into Yemen, so a complete special ops withdrawal from the Horn would also complicate the counterterrorism fight against al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula in Yemen, where a U.S. drone strike Thursday killed Harith bin Ghazi al-Nadhari, AQAP’s spiritual leader, and three other militants.

Now, military spokespeople are trying to walk back the comments, insisting that Army Gen. Joseph Votel, head of U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM), “was just stating an opinion” and that the elite forces won’t be leaving anytime soon.

“There are no major changes planned in the near term, and there will likely be a role for SOCOM forces in each region over the long term,” Army Col. Mark Cheadle, the spokesman for U.S. Africa Command, told Foreign Policy.

The issue arose during a question-and-answer session with Votel after a speech he gave to the National Defense Industrial Association’s Special Operations/Low-Intensity Conflict symposium in Washington. Votel was asked about conventional troops taking over missions that traditionally belonged to special operations forces (SOF).

“As I look at areas like the Horn of Africa, where we’ve had SOF forces for some time now, I think we are beginning to get to a point where we can in fact take our SOF forces out of there and allow conventional forces … to come in and assist with those longer-term efforts to sustain security and capability with our partners down there,” Votel said.

In an email reply to questions from Foreign Policy, Cheadle said that Votel “does not want to take all SOF” out of the Horn of Africa. U.S. Special Operations Command spokesman Army Col. Thomas Davis said that there was “no plan or initiative” to pull special ops out of the Horn and that any decision about the future would be made by Army Gen. David Rodriguez, the head of Africa Command.

MOHAMED DAHIR/AFP/Getty Images

Seán D. Naylor is the author of Relentless Strike – The Secret History of Joint Special Operations Command. Twitter: @seandnaylor

More from Foreign Policy

Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.
Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America

The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.
Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense

If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War

Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.
An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests

And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.