Best Defense

Thomas E. Ricks' daily take on national security.

Mulling military structure (III): Reasons for teaching drill, and what would it be if we were developing it nowadays?

Back in the day, I spent a lot of time watching recruits drill at Parris Island. But I never thought much about its origins.

MCRD_Lights_Out
MCRD_Lights_Out

Back in the day, I spent a lot of time watching recruits drill at Parris Island. But I never thought much about its origins.

7957739594_df096c9404_k

7957739594_df096c9404_k
Back in the day, I spent a lot of time watching recruits drill at Parris Island. But I never thought much about its origins.

So I was struck to learn that drill, when first invented in the late 16th century, was kind of a high-tech conceptual innovation. Yes, it helped coordinate movement and instill discipline, as it still does today. But repeatedly practicing the steps of loading and firing muskets also had the extremely practical purpose of increasing the reliability and effectiveness of gunfire. “Countermarch,” which I thought was just a fancy move to vary things, was invented to get shooters up front to fire and then get them out of the way while they reloaded. By the time the soldier got up to the front rank again, he was again ready to fire. William McNeill, in discussing this, also notes that the countermarch deterred soldiers moving back to reload from keeping on going and fleeing the battlefield.

Btw, Maurice of Orange, the soldier who made drill essential, also opened Europe’s first military academy.

I wonder: What would be the contemporary equivalent of drill? I suspect it would be teaching small units how to wield great firepower — that is, stay alive in the field, use their sense and reconnaissance assets, and then call in missiles, drones and aircraft for strikes or further ISR. Just as drill had multiple steps, so would this, and it would be done until the movements were unconscious. A squad would conduct a symphony of assets, and it would seem as newfangled as drill did 400 years ago.

Flickr

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military from 1991 to 2008 for the Wall Street Journal and then the Washington Post. He can be reached at ricksblogcomment@gmail.com. Twitter: @tomricks1

More from Foreign Policy

Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.
Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America

The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.
Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense

If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War

Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.
An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests

And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.