Military structure and change (4): The significance of high turnover at the top
One of the drivers of change in the French military in the late 18th century and early 19th century was that a whole lot of generals were killed.
Another thought on how militaries adjust to new realities:
Another thought on how militaries adjust to new realities:
One of the drivers of change in the French military in the late 18th century and early 19th century was that a whole lot of generals were killed. “During the Republic, 80 generals were killed in action, and during the Napoleonic wars 139 more suffered the same fate,” writes Gunther Rothenberg.
Trying to respond to French victories, enemy militaries found they also had to get new blood. Out of the 142 generals in the Prussian military in 1806, the year it suffered a debacle, only 22 were still on active duty in 1809. This began a period of swift overhaul. When the Prussian army sallied out in 1813, Rothenberg writes, “it was animated by a new spirit, led by new commanders, and fought according to new combat doctrines.”
Of course, they had to confront the fact that they needed to change. I don’t think our military today has gotten that message. There are days when I despair.
Carl Röchling/Wikimedia Commons
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.