Iran’s Supreme Leader Issues New Demands as Deadline Looms

With just a week to go before the final deadline, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Tuesday issued a new set of demands to world powers negotiating a deal on Tehran’s nuclear program.

Iranian women hold posters of Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei during a rally in Tehran on Feb. 11, 2015.
Iranian women hold posters of Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei during a rally in Tehran on Feb. 11, 2015.
Iranian women hold posters of Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei during a rally in Tehran on Feb. 11, 2015. ATTA KENARE/AFP/Getty Images

Here we go again.

With just a week to go before the final deadline, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Tuesday issued a new set of demands to world powers negotiating a deal on Tehran’s nuclear program.

Like the previous instances, in which Khamenei attracted attention with his hard-bargaining “red lines,” the new demands are far outside the realm of what the West would offer the Islamic Republic in the current negotiations.

Here we go again.

With just a week to go before the final deadline, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Tuesday issued a new set of demands to world powers negotiating a deal on Tehran’s nuclear program.

Like the previous instances, in which Khamenei attracted attention with his hard-bargaining “red lines,” the new demands are far outside the realm of what the West would offer the Islamic Republic in the current negotiations.

Unlike previous instances, these demands come days away from the June 30 deadline, prompting questions about whether the Iranian leader is going to blow up a deal at the last minute or is merely engaging in theatrics — a time-honored tradition during the talks.

In his televised speech on Tuesday, Khamenei said sanctions imposed on the Islamic Republic should be lifted immediately after a deal is signed. He also ruled out freezing Iran’s controversial nuclear work for an extended period of time.

“Freezing Iran’s research and development for a long time, like 10 or 12 years, is not acceptable,” Khamenei said, according to Iranian TV. “All financial and economic sanctions imposed by the U.N. Security Council, the U.S. Congress, or the U.S. government should be lifted immediately when we sign a nuclear agreement.”

The United States and its negotiating partners — Britain, France, China, Germany, and Russia — insist that Iran commit to restrictions on its program for at least 10 years on sophisticated nuclear work. The United States has also insisted that sanctions be lifted gradually as Iran comes into compliance with the deal, not all at once.

The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ayatollah’s speech.

In an email to Foreign Policy, a senior administration official said the United States would not cave on access and transparency issues. “All parties to the negotiation are well-aware of what is necessary for a final deal, including the access and transparency that will meet our bottom lines. We won’t agree to a deal without that,” said the official. “We expect that there will be many voices and opinions on the difficult issues as we work towards a final deal in the days ahead, but our team is focused on what is happening in the negotiating room.”

Previously, the White House has downplayed Khamenei’s public demands and chided lawmakers who cited the leader’s words as evidence that a deal with Iran was hopeless.

This occurred back in April, when Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) cited Khamenei’s refusal to accept an intrusive inspections regime. “It is the Supreme Leader, not Iran’s president or foreign minister, who really calls the shots in Tehran,” McCain said then. “So for him to say, as he did today, that Iran will not permit inspections of its nuclear facilities anytime, anywhere — and that sanctions relief must be complete and immediate — would appear to be a major setback.”

At the time, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest responded to the Republican hawk in a tweet. “Naïve and reckless for @SenJohnMcCain to believe every word of the Supreme Leader’s political speech. He shouldn’t.”

While it’s difficult to say exactly who’s bluffing and who’s playing it straight, the results should be apparent soon enough. If nothing else, the June 30 deadline will force each side to reveal their cards — once and for all.

Photo credit: ATTA KENARE/AFP/Getty Images

More from Foreign Policy

Soldiers of the P18 Gotland Regiment of the Swedish Army camouflage an armoured vehicle during a field exercise near Visby on the Swedish island of Gotland on May 17.
Soldiers of the P18 Gotland Regiment of the Swedish Army camouflage an armoured vehicle during a field exercise near Visby on the Swedish island of Gotland on May 17.

What Are Sweden and Finland Thinking?

European leaders have reassessed Russia’s intentions and are balancing against the threat that Putin poses to the territorial status quo. 

Ukrainian infantry take part in a training exercise with tanks near Dnipropetrovsk oblast, Ukraine, less than 50 miles from the front lines, on May 9.
Ukrainian infantry take part in a training exercise with tanks near Dnipropetrovsk oblast, Ukraine, less than 50 miles from the front lines, on May 9.

The Window To Expel Russia From Ukraine Is Now

Russia is digging in across the southeast.

U.S. President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken participate in a virtual summit with the leaders of Quadrilateral Security Dialogue countries at the White House in Washington on March 12.
U.S. President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken participate in a virtual summit with the leaders of Quadrilateral Security Dialogue countries at the White House in Washington on March 12.

Why China Is Paranoid About the Quad

Beijing has long lived with U.S. alliances in Asia, but a realigned India would change the game.

Members of the National Defence Training Association of Finland attend a training.
Members of the National Defence Training Association of Finland attend a training.

Finns Show Up for Conscription. Russians Dodge It.

Two seemingly similar systems produce very different militaries.