Iran Nuclear Talks Are Extended (Again)
On Tuesday, the State Department announced that negotiators working to complete a landmark agreement to limit Tehran’s nuclear program will miss today’s deadline and continue negotiations for several days.
In the latest in a long series of delays, the State Department said negotiators working to complete a landmark agreement to limit Tehran’s nuclear program will miss a Tuesday deadline and continue negotiating for several more days.
“We're frankly more concerned about the quality of the deal than we are about the clock, though we also know that difficult decisions won't get any easier with time -- that is why we are continuing to negotiate,” said State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf in a statement on Tuesday.
Iran and six world powers -- the United States, Britain, Russia, China, France, and Germany -- agreed to extend the interim nuclear agreement known as the Joint Plan of Action to Friday. That agreement, which was set to expire, rolled back aspects of Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for modest sanctions relief.
In the latest in a long series of delays, the State Department said negotiators working to complete a landmark agreement to limit Tehran’s nuclear program will miss a Tuesday deadline and continue negotiating for several more days.
“We’re frankly more concerned about the quality of the deal than we are about the clock, though we also know that difficult decisions won’t get any easier with time — that is why we are continuing to negotiate,” said State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf in a statement on Tuesday.
Iran and six world powers — the United States, Britain, Russia, China, France, and Germany — agreed to extend the interim nuclear agreement known as the Joint Plan of Action to Friday. That agreement, which was set to expire, rolled back aspects of Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for modest sanctions relief.
Perhaps most critically, the failure to meet Tuesday’s deadline raises the likelihood that the United States will not be able to send a final deal to Congress by July 9. The White House agreed to a legislative compromise in May that gave Congress 30 days to review a final agreement on Iran’s nuclear program if the deal is sent to Capitol Hill by Thursday. Failing to meet that deadline gives Congress 60 days to review the accord, an outcome the White House wanted to avoid because it gives hawks on Capitol Hill more time to lobby against the agreement.
Speaking to reporters in Vienna, the European Union’s foreign-policy chief Federica Mogherini said the talks had entered a “difficult and sensitive” moment but did not elaborate. According to reports from the talks, a key sticking point is Iran’s insistence that all United Nations sanctions against Tehran be lifted, most importantly, a ban on the import and export of conventional weapons. The United States and Europe oppose lifting the embargo.
On Tuesday, Harf said that Secretary of State John Kerry, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, and Mogherini would remain in Vienna to continue the negotiations. “We’ve made substantial progress in every area, but this work is highly technical and high stakes for all of the countries involved,” she said.
All week, the Iranians had insisted that the July 9 deadline of delivering a deal to Congress constituted an American, not an Iranian, concern. “We cannot sacrifice a good deal at the expense of meeting a deadline,” an Iranian official told reporters in a background briefing on Monday. “And in our opinion, that is an artificial deadline.”
Photo credit: Joe Klamar/AFP/Getty Images
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
