Who is right about how our nation wages war, Samuel Huntington or Eliot Cohen?
Michele Flournoy, the person most likely to become defense secretary in a future Democratic administration, dissed the hell out of Samuel Huntington’s theory of civil-military relations the other day at the Future of War Conference.
Best Defense is in summer re-runs. This item originally appeared on March 2, 2015.
Best Defense is in summer re-runs. This item originally appeared on March 2, 2015.
Michele Flournoy, the person most likely to become defense secretary in a future Democratic administration, dissed the hell out of Samuel Huntington’s theory of civil-military relations the other day at the Future of War Conference. There is not a neat separation of civilian and military realms, she was saying. It is not like the civilians decide to go to war and then get out of the way of the military.
Rather, Flournoy said, “It is an Eliot Cohen world.” I took this to be a reference to the messy system he describes in his study Supreme Command. (Full disclosure: I met Huntington once, but Eliot Cohen is a friend. In a way, I thought of my book The Generals as an appendix to his book.)
In other news, I recently learned that Flournoy’s father worked on I Love Lucy.
Wikimedia Commons
More from Foreign Policy

Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?
The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.

Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World
It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.

It’s a New Great Game. Again.
Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.

Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.