Michigan Senator Edges White House Closer to Win on Iran Deal
Another key Democrat came out in support of the Iran nuclear agreement on Monday, moving President Barack Obama’s administration closer to a political victory that would ensure veto-proof backing in Congress for the landmark accord. Michigan Sen. Debbie Stabenow endorsed the deal a day after the Senate’s top Democrat, Minority Leader Harry Reid, declared his ...
Another key Democrat came out in support of the Iran nuclear agreement on Monday, moving President Barack Obama’s administration closer to a political victory that would ensure veto-proof backing in Congress for the landmark accord.
Another key Democrat came out in support of the Iran nuclear agreement on Monday, moving President Barack Obama’s administration closer to a political victory that would ensure veto-proof backing in Congress for the landmark accord.
Michigan Sen. Debbie Stabenow endorsed the deal a day after the Senate’s top Democrat, Minority Leader Harry Reid, declared his support for the agreement — a major win for the White House as it fights to head off an attempt to derail the accord.
Stabenow became the 28th senator to back the deal.
And that leaves the U.S. administration only six votes short of the 34 required to uphold a veto from Obama, which he is expected to issue once the Republican majority in Congress votes to reject the accord next month.
So far, only two Democratic senators have come out against the accord – Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and Sen. Bob Menendez of New Jersey.
For opponents, including powerful pro-Israel lobbying groups such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the chances of prevailing in the political battle to scrap the agreement are fading. Instead, AIPAC and other groups are increasingly focused on a symbolic step to underline opposition to the accord, hoping to secure 60 “no” votes needed to overcome a Democratic filibuster. That would require at least four more Democrats to come out against the deal, and Stabenow had been seen as a potential “no” vote.
Stabenow explained her decision in a lengthy statement posted on Twitter, saying the accord — which would impose limits on Iran’s nuclear program in return for lifting economic sanctions — had flaws but represented the best chance to prevent Iran from getting the bomb.
Photo credit: Win McNamee/Getty Images
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.