Best Defense

Thomas E. Ricks' daily take on national security.

Risk: Everyone thinks they know what it means. But they don’t! And that’s why we nowadays wage wars of dwindling assets.

I was glad to see Michael Mazarr tackle the subject of risk the other day in “War on the Rocks.” Among other interesting things, he notes that paying attention to risk is a good way to assess consequences of one’s actions.

588px-at_your_own_risk-svg
588px-at_your_own_risk-svg

Best Defense is in summer re-runs. This item originally appeared on April 17, 2015.

Best Defense is in summer re-runs. This item originally appeared on April 17, 2015.

I was glad to see Michael Mazarr tackle the subject of risk the other day in “War on the Rocks.” Among other interesting things, he notes that paying attention to risk is a good way to assess consequences of one’s actions.

Everybody thinks they know what it means, but I doubt it, because we so talk about it so little. For example, I think that we failed to take enough risks in Iraq and Afghanistan. This partly was because a lot of officers didn’t believe in missions, so made it their priority simply to “bring home everyone alive.” Secondly it was because many officers don’t know how to take calculated risks, and so avoid all risks. And third it was because there are few incentives in the U.S. military to take risks.

Risk has come to be think of as a pure negative. That’s worrisome, because (I believe) if you are not taking risks, you are not pursuing a strategy. Or you are just marking time and letting the enemy call the tune. A risk should been seen as an investment of your time, energy and people. Not all risks will pay off. But if you take none, your assets simply will dwindle. I think that in Iraq (except for 2007-08) and in Afghanistan, we more often that not simply waged wars of dwindling assets.

Mazarr also mentions that much of what we know about risk today comes from the financial markets. This worries me because I think our markets are tremendously skewed, partly because of the influence that campaign finance has given Wall Street. The result is that profits remain private but risks are socialized (that is, too big to fail). So heads, the banker wins; tails, the taxpayer foots the bill.

Motoi Kenkichi/Wikimedia Commons

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military from 1991 to 2008 for the Wall Street Journal and then the Washington Post. He can be reached at ricksblogcomment@gmail.com. Twitter: @tomricks1

More from Foreign Policy

Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.
Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America

The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.
Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense

If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War

Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.
An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests

And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.