Are we doing the extremely wounded any favors by saving their ruined bodies?
That’s the question posed in "Rain," a new novel by a British veteran, Barney Campbell.
That’s the question posed in Rain, a new novel by a British veteran, Barney Campbell:
“I’m not sure whether it would have been better for some of the really bad ones just to have bled out. To have had the medic overdose them on morphine, loosen the tourniquets and let them just slip away in peace, surrounded by their friends, instead of facing decades of people that will give way sooner or later to apathy.”
It is a hard question, and one that I don’t think we have addressed. I remember asking two American neurosurgeons in Iraq about saving American soldiers who were head shot. Their response was a concerned shrug. They said they could save just about anybody except a soldier with a transverse shot behind the ears. But, they added, they weren’t sure that saving some of the others was indeed the right thing to do.
Image credit: Amazon.com
Thomas E. Ricks is a former contributing editor to Foreign Policy. Twitter: @tomricks1
More from Foreign Policy
Chinese Hospitals Are Housing Another Deadly Outbreak
Authorities are covering up the spread of antibiotic-resistant pneumonia.
Henry Kissinger, Colossus on the World Stage
The late statesman was a master of realpolitik—whom some regarded as a war criminal.
The West’s False Choice in Ukraine
The crossroads is not between war and compromise, but between victory and defeat.
Washington wants to get tough on China, and the leaders of the House China Committee are in the driver’s seat.