Best Defense

Thomas E. Ricks' daily take on national security.

The horse & the gun: I think mobility and firepower are at the core of our history

Firepower and mobility are the American cultural equivalent of wine and cheese in France, or fish and rice in China. They go to what we are about.

Charles_Marion_Russell_-_The_Custer_Fight_(1903)
Charles_Marion_Russell_-_The_Custer_Fight_(1903)

Firepower and mobility are the American cultural equivalent of wine and cheese in France, or fish and rice in China. They go to what we are about.

Firepower and mobility are the American cultural equivalent of wine and cheese in France, or fish and rice in China. They go to what we are about.

Continuing my binge on early American history, I picked up another Lance Blyth recommendation, Changing Military Patterns of the Great Plains Indians, by Frank Secoy.

It isn’t as good as Comanche Empire, but it is still thought-provoking. Secoy analyzes the spread of the horse (from the Southwest) and the gun (from the Northeast). Some tribes got one first, some got the other. The big winners were those who were among the first to get both—the Sioux in the north and our friends the Comanches in the southwest.  “Shortly after 1770 a series of changes began which upset the balance of power, enabling the Sioux to expand westward.” Most notably, when the fur trade resumed after being interrupted by the French & Indian War, it brought guns and ammo. “The Sioux took advantage of this to cross to the west side [of the Missouri] in summer to hunt the buffalo, and to secure horses from the western tribes, mainly by raiding.”

The more I read, the more I think that American history begins in earnest about the time that the horse and the gun overlapped, which Secoy says is around 1750.

The Indian adaptation of both the horse and the gun strike me as an impressive story of human flexibility.

A side note: It is interesting that the gun trade required good trade relations, while the horse business did not. This is because horses could be raided as well as traded, but there was only one way for an Indian tribe to secure a steady supply of guns and ammunition, and that was by buying them.

Image credit: Charles Marion Russell/Library of Congress/Wikimedia Commons

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military from 1991 to 2008 for the Wall Street Journal and then the Washington Post. He can be reached at ricksblogcomment@gmail.com. Twitter: @tomricks1

More from Foreign Policy

Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.
Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America

The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.
Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense

If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War

Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.
An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests

And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.