Pentagon’s Drone Pilots Get a Nod, but No Medals
The Defense Department has decided to offer pins to drone pilots, but medals still elude the unmanned crews.
For the past decade, drone pilots have played a central role in U.S. efforts to target extremists and track their shadowy leaders across the Middle East and Africa. Now the Pentagon wants to acknowledge their contributions. But don’t expect them to get a medal for it.
After years of contentious debate, the Defense Department has finally decided it won’t issue new medals to drone pilots or cyber-technicians who wage war from air-conditioned pods nestled near American strip malls. Instead, the Pentagon plans to give what amounts to pins to attach to non-combat medals awarded for earlier action.
Defense officials have struggled for years with how to recognize the contributions of troops who operate thousands of miles from the front lines but still impact the battlefield. In this new age of war by remote control, the rules are still being written, but old ways of deciding who is a combatant -- and who isn’t -- die hard.
For the past decade, drone pilots have played a central role in U.S. efforts to target extremists and track their shadowy leaders across the Middle East and Africa. Now the Pentagon wants to acknowledge their contributions. But don’t expect them to get a medal for it.
After years of contentious debate, the Defense Department has finally decided it won’t issue new medals to drone pilots or cyber-technicians who wage war from air-conditioned pods nestled near American strip malls. Instead, the Pentagon plans to give what amounts to pins to attach to non-combat medals awarded for earlier action.
Defense officials have struggled for years with how to recognize the contributions of troops who operate thousands of miles from the front lines but still impact the battlefield. In this new age of war by remote control, the rules are still being written, but old ways of deciding who is a combatant — and who isn’t — die hard.
In a document announcing the new award, the Defense Department explained that “as the impact of remote operations on combat continues to increase, the necessity of ensuring those actions are distinctly recognized grows.” As a result, an “R” device — to signify service done remotely, outside the war zone — has been designed to be attached to “non-combat performance awards to specifically recognize remote but direct impact on combat operations,” according to the document.
At the same time, a second new “C” award — for combat — is being rolled out to attach to earlier medals, but it will only be given to troops who have otherwise participated in combat.
The debate over giving new awards to drone pilots and cyber-troops came to a head in 2013, when then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta created a Distinguished Warfare Medal for “extraordinary achievement” that did not require the recipient to have been downrange for combat.
Angry veterans groups quickly objected that the new award would rank higher than the Bronze Star, which requires “heroic or meritorious achievement or service” to win.
Following the outcry, Panetta’s successor, then-Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, scuttled the plan two months later while announcing a general review of all medals and citations awarded by the Pentagon.
The result of that study was released Thursday and includes a huge new Pentagon initiative to review more than 1,000 medals the military has awarded during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Under the plan, the armed services will reexamine awards for distinguished service, Navy and Air Force Crosses, and Silver Stars for possible upgrade to the Medal of Honor.
Photo credit: Ethan Miller/Getty Images
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
