The Cable

North Korea Just Cut Its Last Diplomatic Channel to the U.S.

Shortly after North Korea threatened a “physical response” to the deployment of a U.S. missile defense system in South Korea on Monday, Pyongyang announced another move likely to ratchet up tensions with the United States: severing its only diplomatic link with Washington at the United Nations in New York.

This photo taken on May 6, 2016 and released on May 7 by North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) shows North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un reporting works of North Korean Workers Party Central Committee during the 7th Workers Party Congress at the 'April 25 Palace' in Pyongyang. / AFP / KCNA VIA KNS / STR        (Photo credit should read STR/AFP/Getty Images)
This photo taken on May 6, 2016 and released on May 7 by North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) shows North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un reporting works of North Korean Workers Party Central Committee during the 7th Workers Party Congress at the 'April 25 Palace' in Pyongyang. / AFP / KCNA VIA KNS / STR (Photo credit should read STR/AFP/Getty Images)

Shortly after North Korea threatened a “physical response” to the deployment of a U.S. missile defense system in South Korea on Monday, Pyongyang announced another move likely to ratchet up tensions with the United States: severing its only diplomatic link with Washington at the United Nations in New York.

Washington and Pyongyang do not have formal diplomatic relations, so the isolated kingdom’s U.N. mission has for years served as a channel for the two countries to communicate, especially in discussions to end North Korea’s illicit nuclear weapons program. This channel proved crucial during the negotiations leading up to the landmark 1994 Agreed Framework, an ultimately ill-fated accord that sought to curb the program and eventually normalize relations between the two countries. It has been less vital during six-party talks involving major powers like China, which create other ways of exchanging messages. Now, however, Pyongyang will “totally cut off” communication with the U.S. mission in the U.N., according to the foreign ministry.

The provocative measure, which comes ahead of joint U.S.-South Korean military exercises in the region, could increase the chances of a military flare up on the peninsula. Experts also said it would dramatically complicate efforts to negotiate the release of two American citizens detained by North Korea.

“The cutting off of diplomatic communications under such circumstances is how states can fall into conflict,” Victor Cha, director of Asian studies at Georgetown University, told Foreign Policy. “This decision is especially bad for the detained Americans as the negotiations for these cases often used the New York channel.”

With the North Korean channel closed, all of Pyongyang’s dealings with Washington — including the negotiations over two detained American citizens — will be conducted under “wartime law,” according to the official Korean Central News Agency. “The U.S. is wholly to blame for the ensuing unpleasant things happening in the bilateral ties,” said the regime’s foreign ministry.

It remains unclear how that might affect the cases of Kim Dong-chul, a Korean-born American who’s serving a 10 year hard labor sentence after being convicted of spying in April, and Otto Warmbier, an American serving 15 years of hard labor for attempting to steal a banner from his hotel in the Korean capital. In the past, the North has suggested that wartime laws would preclude detainees from being released on humanitarian grounds. The rationale for the severing of ties cited by Pyongyang was the U.S. decision to impair the “dignity of the supreme leadership of the DPRK by releasing what they call ‘report on human rights’ and ‘list of targets of special sanctions.’”

On Wednesday, the U.S. slapped economic sanctions on about 10 North Korean officials and — for the first time — leader Kim Jong Un — for what U.S. officials called “notorious abuses of human rights.” The sanctions targeted a range of assets, including property under U.S. jurisdiction. The other senior officials targeted were Choe Pu II, head of the Ministry of People’s Security; Ri Song Choi, a counselor in the Ministry of People’s Security; and Kang Song Nam, bureau director at the Ministry of State Security.

The U.S. also angered Pyongyang on Friday when Washington and Seoul announced an accord to deploy a missile defense system known as the Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense, or Thaad, on the peninsula. The two allies said the system would serve to protect South Korea and U.S. forces operating in the region from Pyongyang’s increasingly sophisticated nuclear and ballistic missile systems. There are about 28,500 U.S. troops based in South Korea. The location of the Thaad base is expected to be revealed sometime this year.

North Korea has said the stated reason for deploying the system was “absurd,” and claimed that its arsenal, including an intermediate-range ballistic missile program, was for “self defense.”

Tensions between the two countries have plunged after the North carried out a spate of missile tests this year following an atomic-bomb test in January — moves that prompted increased U.S and U.N. sanctions on the Hermit Kingdom.

Experts are divided about the long term risks of cutting off communications in New York. Scott Snyder, a Korea expert at the Council on Foreign Relations said the channel has been operating as “more of a drop box for delivery of messages between the two governments.”

“Its absence will not have a major impact on relations between the two governments but signifies their deterioration,” he told FP.

But Cha noted a particular risk of having no direct channel open ahead of the annual U.S.-South Korea exercises in August, which focus on defending South Korea from a North Korean attack and typically prompt provocations from both sides, according to data in a new CSIS report.

When the State Department was asked if the termination of the channel could create additional risks during military exercises, spokesman John Kirby said the U.S. would continue with the drills regardless. “We have significant security commitments … within the Republic of Korea that we intend to continue to meet,” he said. “A key way to assure military readiness is to exercise.” 

China could theoretically serve as an intermediary, but Cha said Beijing might only intervene once a crisis “that might otherwise have been avoided” was already underway.

“We are in a situation where one side is ratcheting up provocations while the other is sanctioning at unprecedented levels,” he said. “We are entering such a period without the New York channel open to keep things from boiling over.”

This post has been updated. 

Getty Images

John Hudson is a senior reporter at Foreign Policy, where he covers diplomacy and national security issues in Washington. He has reported from several geopolitical hotspots, including Ukraine, Pakistan, Malaysia, China, and Georgia. Prior to joining FP, John covered politics and global affairs for the Atlantic magazine’s news blog, the Atlantic Wire. In 2008, he covered the August war between Russia and Georgia from Tbilisi and the breakaway region of Abkhazia. He has appeared on CNN, MSNBC, BBC, C-SPAN, Fox News radio, Al Jazeera, and other broadcast outlets. He has been with the magazine since 2013. @john_hudson

Trending Now Sponsored Links by Taboola

By Taboola

More from Foreign Policy

By Taboola